0947 Page – Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court Appeals Records, 1913, 1914

Visible Translated Text Is As Follows:

that he is personally acquainted with M. Johenning, one of the jurors in the above stated case, and that during the month of May, 1913, said M. Johenning had a conversation with this deponent, in which he discussed the death of little Mary Phagan.

Further deposing he says that in said conversation the said juror, M. Johenning, expressed his opinion to deponent that Frank was guilty of the murder of Mary Phagan, and that it was necessary and conviction.

Sworn to and subscribed before me this 2nd day of September, 1913.
H. C. LOEVENHART.
C. W. BURKE,
Notary Public, Fulton County, Georgia.

EXHIBIT H.

Georgia, Fulton County.
State of Georgia, ) In Fulton Superior Court.
vs. )
Leo M. Frank. )

Before me personally appeared Miss Miriam Loevenhart, who makes this affidavit to be used on motion for a new trial in the above stated case.

Deposing on oath she says that she is personally acquainted with M. Johenning, a juror, who served in the above stated case; she says that prior to the trial of Leo M. Frank, said juror, M. Johenning, had a conversation with this deponent and deponent's mother, and in their presence expressed his profound conviction that Leo M. Frank was certainly guilty of the murder of Mary Phagan.

Further deposing she says that said M. Johenning made this statement, positively, almost vehemently, and that his exact language, which was in response to a remark from this deponent in reference to the case was, as near as deponent recalls, "I know that he is guilty," referring to Leo Frank. Said M. Johenning made this statement more than once to this deponent before the commencement of the trial of Leo M. Frank for murder.

Sworn to and subscribed before me this 2d day of September, 1913.
MIRIAM LOEVENHART.
C. W. BURKE,
Notary Public, Fulton County, Georgia.

EXHIBIT I.

Georgia, Fulton County.
State of Georgia, ) In Fulton Superior Court.
vs. ) Conviction of Murder.
Leo M. Frank. ) July Term, 1913. Motion for New Trial.

Personally came before the undersigned, Leo M. Frank, who upon oath says that he is the defendant in the above stated case, and that his sole counsel in said case were L. Z. Rosser, Morris Brandon, R. R. Arnold and H. J. Haas.

127