156 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Reading Time: 3 minutes [389 words]


Here is the translated text as follows:

124 X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALS.

If a killing is premeditated, it constitutes murder in the first degree. For example, if one person, without uttering a word, strikes another on the head with an axe, this would be deemed premeditated violence under our law. It will constitute the offense if circumstances of willfulness and deliberation are proven, even if they arose and were generated at the time of the transaction. If the party killing had time to think and did intend to kill, whether for a moment, an hour, or a day, it is a deliberate, willful, and premeditated killing, constituting murder in the first degree.

The principle of inferring intent from the nature and character of the weapon and wound is well-established and runs through a long series of judicial inquiries. It is as firmly established as any other principle governing the administration of criminal law. The State might safely rest the proof of malice upon this fact alone, but there are other facts and circumstances bearing so directly upon this point that I cannot let them pass without notice.

The concealing of the body also furnishes evidence of malice. Mr. Wright thinks little importance can be attached to this, as an innocent person, through extreme fear, might do the same. I can well imagine a case in which it might occur. A very timid man might slay another in self-defense when no other person was present to witness the transaction, and the fear of being charged with murder without being able to prove the justification might induce him to conceal the body. However, such a person would not appropriate the property of the deceased.

Worrell, moreover, had Bruff with him to prove the personal conflict, if any had taken place. Besides this, he is a bold, daring, reckless adventurer, not having the fear of God or man to molest him. In his case, then, the circumstances attending the concealing of the body furnish abundant evidence of malice. He also rifled the pockets of Gordon and took and appropriated his horse, watch, saddle, bridle, and saddlebags with their contents. This leaves no doubt as to the motive for the commission of the crime. At about this time, the company was collecting county and individual subscriptions for stock, and as Gordon was on his way to St. Louis,

---

Related Posts
Top