0253 Page – Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court Appeals Records, 1913, 1914

Reading Time: 3 minutes [359 words]


Here is the extracted text from the image:

because of the following:

The Solicitor General in his concluding argument, in referring to act of Judge Roan, discharging the witness, Conley, from custody, stated:

"Judge Roan did it, no reflection on the Sheriff, but with the friends of this man Frank, pouring in there at all hours of the night, offering him sandwiches and whiskey and threatening his life, things that this Sheriff, who is as good as the Chief of Police but no better, couldn't guard against because of the physical structure of the jail, Jim Conley asked, and His Honor granted the request, that he be remanded back into the custody of the honorable men who manage the police department of the City of Atlanta,".

Whereupon the following occurred:

"Mr. Rosser, No, that's a mistake, that isn't correct, Your Honor discharged him from custody, he said that under that petition Your Honor sent him back to the custody where you had him before, and that isn't true, Your Honor discharged him vacated the order, that's what you did,"

"Mr. Dorsey, Here's an order committing him down there first you are right about that, I'm glad you are right one time".

"Mr. Rosser, That's more than you have ever been",

Mr. Dorsey (resuming): "No matter what the outcome of the order may have been, the effect of the order passed by his Honor, Judge Roan, who presides in this case, was to remand him into the custody of the police of the City of Atlanta".

"Mr. Rosser, I dispute that, that isn't the effect of the order passed by His Honor, the effect of the order passed by his Honor was to turn him out, and they went through the farce of turning him out on the street and carrying him right back That isn't the effect of Your Honor's judgment. In this sort of case, we ought to have the exact truth".

"The Court, This is what I concede to be the effect of that ruling, I passed this order upon the motion of State's counsel first, is my recollection, and by consent of Conley's atty."

"Mr. Rosser, I'm asking only for the effect of the last one".

/170.

Related Posts
Top