0261 Page – Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court Appeals Records, 1913, 1914

Here is the extracted text from the image:

obtaining the facts in connection with statements made by said
persons, and all of them, and all of said statements have come
to their knowledge since the rendition of the verdict and
sentence in said case, as is shown by the dates mentioned in the
jurats to each affidavit, and deponents have brought same to the
attention of the Court at the earliest possible moment at
which the Court could take cognizance of said affidavits after
the trial, which is the date on which the rule ni si is on
return; that is, October 4, 1913, same being on that day pre-
sented to the Court as part of the motion for new trial.

Further deponing, deponents say that, had they known at the
trial of any of the facts or statements of the jurors, which
would disqualify, or tend to disqualify said jurors, or either
of them, when said jurors were put upon the voir dire in said
case, these deponents would have brought the same to the
attention of the Court at said time.

L. Z. Rosser,
Morris Brandon,
Reuben R. Arnold,
Herbert J. Haas

Sworn to and subscribed before me, by each
of the above four named deponents, this
October 28th, 1913.

E. D. Thomas,
Notary Public Fulton County, Ga.