Author: Historical Librarian


752 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:They were never permitted to speak to anyone except in the presence of a sentinel. On board the Panda was a sailor who could speak English; his name was Perico. He was a fat white man, but I do not know his country. He died on board the schooner. Perico was a Spaniard but had sailed on board an American brig. The powder of the Panda was stowed in her hold at Havana. I had not been concerned in the war between Spain and her colonies. I have been on board both Danish and

753 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSCaptain Pedro Gibert hailed the English captain and ordered him to come on board. The English captain replied that his boat leaked so badly that he would not be able to keep it afloat. Captain Gibert insisted that the English captain come on board quickly. The English then launched their boat, and the captain, boatswain, and two men came on board the schooner.The corvette was robbed of five goats, one cheese, several cases of preserves, cordials, and two half coils of rigging. No other piracy was committed after the robbery of

754 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:We found the ship on fire and I was the first to board her. The first thing we did was to put out the fire, which we found in the magazine below the cabin floor. One of our men went down and discovered a quantity of cotton and brimstone burning, along with a slow match ignited and communicating with the magazine. The magazine contained fourteen or sixteen water casks of powder. We looked for the ship’s papers and logbook but did not find them.We then bent the schooner’s sails and went up the river.

755 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSI remember going ashore and don't think Perez was in the boat; there were only two of the prisoners, and they were the men whom I have mentioned. I recall going to the River Bona in the Curlew. Some of the prisoners were on board the Esperanza, and others on board the Curlew. The mate, the carpenter, and three others were in irons. The captain of the Panda did some translations for Captain Trotter; Captain Trotter might have regaled him with wine and brandy. When we were in the River Bona,

756 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSWhile in Cape Lopez, we had more prisoners than men of our own. There was then some appearance of a rising among the prisoners, but never at any other time.At Cape Lopez, Captain Trotter and some of our men were taken prisoners by the African king. They were captured on Sunday and kept until Wednesday. It required considerable negotiation to secure their release. Captain Trotter was never anxious on account of the capture of the Panda or the Esperanza. I was in Fernando Po when Perez was examined. Captain Trotter, in

757 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSMr. Child: We do not know gentle or simple here.Justice Story: If there is anything objectionable in my usage of the word "gentleman," I will use the word "man," although I consider that all present are entitled to the former appellation.Cross-Examination Continued:I do not know whether the powder placed in the cabin to blow up the vessel was in a bag or not. I saw a bag hauled up and also a match still burning. The name of the man who first went down is Trumbull. I know nothing of Trumbull

758 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:American State TrialsMr. Dunlap: I scarcely know what Mr. Child means by restricting the prisoners. I believe the other counsel, Mr. Hilliard, would not say what Mr. Child had said.Mr. Hilliard was perfectly satisfied with the conduct of the District Attorney on this, as on all other occasions, and should always feel happy in being opposed to the gentleman.**Simon Domingo:** I went with the Panda from Prince’s Island to the River Nazareth. When we arrived there, we came to anchor and lay there for four months, "doing nothing." They had previously traded for negroes.

759 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Pedro Gibert and OthersJean went ashore at Nazareth by Captain Trotter's orders to search for the hidden money. Two of the prisoners guided us, but we found no money. The prisoners were accompanied by an English officer, to whom they were obedient. They showed him the place where it was first buried but could not tell where it had been taken to. The English captain got some money, but I don't know how much; he took it away from Captain Gibert at Cape Lopez. I was a prisoner but not in irons. I never

760 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:728 XY. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSThe Panda did not pursue them themselves but sent the negroes who were standing armed on the beach. There was a great number of negroes, though I don't know how many; they extended all along the beach.Captain Trotter went to the king two or three times to demand the prisoners. At last, he went with the crew to take the prisoners by force. I don't know if Captain Gibert and his men interceded with the king not to harm the English. When the Panda was blown up, part of the

761 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSThe English crew was not called up to take their share of any money. Captain Gibert went ashore when the Panda reached Nazareth and came back after two months. He was sick on board for five days. Once he recovered, he went ashore again and did not return to the ship. I think the captain went on board once after that.Anastasio Sivera, 23 years of age, shipped on board the Panda on the 8th of February, 1833. We first went to Cape Lopez and then to Nazareth. They ran her ashore

762 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:American State TrialsCaptain Jeremiah Briggs: I have commanded nine merchantmen over 32 years. My voyages have generally been to the East Indies, and I have also been to Rio and other South American ports. It is customary, when hailed, if from Salem, to answer "from Boston," as Boston is a port more known than Salem, particularly to foreign navigators. I have never been on the coast of Guinea.Mr. Dunlap: Suppose a clipper, bound for the coast of Africa, sails from Havana on the 20th of August, and a vessel like the Mexican, a dull

763 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Pedro Gibert and OthersThe average rate of sailing for ships is about one hundred and twenty miles per day. In summer, they typically sail one hundred and twenty miles, while in winter, they cover around one hundred and sixty to one hundred and seventy miles. The passage from New York to Liverpool is completed in twenty-seven to thirty-three days during the summer. However, the yards of packet ships are squarer than those of ordinary merchantmen, and they carry a heavier crew. On average, it can be said that packet ships sail a knot an

764 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:American State TrialsWith a stock of the best provisions on the coast, owing to the best sources, such as beef, pork, etc., the weather was favorable. It is advisable to take but little bread, as it spoils.Mr. Dunlap asked the witness if he had not been involved in the slave trade. Mr. Child objected to the question as irrelevant. Judge Story did not think so, as the query concerned the gentleman’s—she begged pardon—the witness's character. Mr. Dunlap again posed his question, to which the witness replied that when he could not get ivory, he

765 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSPedro Gibert and others. 733°Six, or six and a half. A clipper will, on average, sail one-third faster than a merchant vessel. The Panda and Mexican would not be likely to meet because the schooner ought to be much ahead of the brig. I am well acquainted with the currency on the African coast. Spanish dollars are current there—even doubloons and ounces will pass. I have been on the coast as far as Congo and thirty leagues up the river. Petty Sestos and Nyphoo are not the same places. Vessels going

766 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:134 XY. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSI think, from what I see of the Mexican's track, that she was a dull sailer, and there would be a difference of about one-third between her and a Baltimore clipper in smooth water. The meeting of the Panda and Mexican, with one sailing on the 20th from Havana and the other from Salem on the 29th, would be very improbable, but not impossible. I should think the Panda would be at the Cape de Verde by the 20th of September. To pass through the Bahama Channel and reach 30°

767 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Pedro Gibert and OthersThe engagement was not considered in Havana to disparage any man's character.Isaac A. Coolidge, the underkeeper of the jail, was asked to identify the colored men, Ridgly and Lewis, of the Mexican, as the persons who called at the jail and stated that they recognized one of the prisoners. He was unable to swear to the parties.Charles Sumner saw Ridgly in court, either at the time the prisoners were arraigned or when they were brought up to receive copies of the indictment against them. Ridgly was near the crier's desk, surrounded

768 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:736 ¥. AMERICAN STATE TRIALS.He deceived him by telling him that he would not be kept a prisoner, while, in reality, he was now as much a prisoner as the others. I think, when he said this, he did not refer to any individuals in this country, but to the English. I told Mr. Dunlap what the prisoner had said, and Mr. Dunlap replied, "Very well, he may do as he pleases; if he does not like to be a witness, we can do without him." Perez then cooled down, did not appear in

769 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSIt's my turn now." He was in a state of excitement.Ebenezer Prescott: I am an officer of the court. Ridgly was intoxicated at the time. I saw Mr. Sumner and others talking to him a short time after, and not thinking it proper that he should be questioned in his then state, I went and told Mr. Dunlap.Henry Homer: Ridgly was one-half or two-thirds drunk. I saw many people around him, among others, Mr. Child, who was listening and speaking to him. I heard one of the bystanders say to Mr.

770 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:In the most unclouded state of understanding, with the most unwavering attention to facts and the strictest self-examination, we must be cautious not to, through rashness, inadvertency, or prejudice, pass sentence upon the innocent and commit a judicial murder. If these considerations are important when dealing with a solitary individual, how much greater must their importance be in the present case? You are not now called upon to decide the fate of one, but of twelve persons. The lives of twelve men are in your hands. Your verdict will determine whether the individuals who

771 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSTo the countenance and eye of the prisoner, a new expression emerges. We see guilt written in every lineament of his visage, and we translate the look of conscious innocence into ruffian hardiness or callous indifference.These men, gentlemen, are accused of the crime of piracy and are consequently viewed with horror as robbers and murderers. Let me entreat you to lay aside all prepossessions of this kind and not suppose, because the prisoners are accused, that they are guilty. There is not a man, perhaps, who has looked upon these individuals

772 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Consider the circumstances under which the prisoners have come to this country. They have been brought here with a sort of éclat, much to their disadvantage. A vast apparatus seems to have been put in motion against them. England, the queen of the ocean, has stretched forth her arm against them, and every man, from the Lords of the Admiralty down to the youngest midshipman on board the Curlew, seems to have decided upon their fate. We are too likely to be influenced by these circumstances and imagine that England would not have taken

773 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSIf it was sound, we would have failed in our duty had we not done this. Had we not acted thus, and had the prisoners been convicted, that conviction would have been something we could never have overcome. The forms and countenances of these men would have haunted our midday steps, disturbed our midnight slumbers, and we would never again have known peace.If the individuals before you, gentlemen, are innocent, is there not something in their condition calculated to touch the heart? They are here, after a long confinement, with scarcely

774 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:742 X, AMERICAN STATE TRIALS.The extension was granted to Otis solely to provide the Executive with time to receive information from the court.Mr. Hilliard stated that some of the prisoners had been identified by the crew of the Mexican. It was well known that no evidence was more prone to objection than that relating to identity. Nothing changed more than the human countenance when exposed to the influence of a tropical sun or strong excitement. The records of the courts proved this. The captain thought he recognized a dead man (Delgardo) as one of

775 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSMr. Hilliard addressed the court, highlighting several key points. He noted the fact that Perez had since stated that the cook was not present at all, which cast doubt on the reliability of Perez's testimony. Mr. Hilliard referred to Perez's statements to Mr. Badlam in jail, where Perez declared, "that all he had previously said was a lie." He pointed out the many inconsistencies in Perez's evidence and that of other witnesses. Finally, he mentioned the circumstance where all the crew identified Boyga as having been on board the Mexican, while

776 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:744 X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSVictims, or that the sword of the law should fall until it is clogged with massacre. Antonio Ferrer is plainly but a servant. He is listed as a free black in the ship’s papers, but that is no proof that he is free. Were he a slave, he would, in all probability, be represented as free, and this for obvious reasons. He is, in all likelihood, a slave and a native African, as the tattooing on his face proves beyond a doubt. At any rate, he is but a servant.

777 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSIn the ocean of life, there are in his bosom the same social sympathies that animate our own. He has nerves to feel pain and a heart to throb with human affections, just as you do. His life, to establish the law or to further the ends of justice, is not required. Taken, it is of no value to us; given to him, it is above the price of rubies.And Costa, the cabin boy, only fifteen years of age when this crime was committed—shall he die? Shall the sword fall upon

778 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:746 X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSThe time will come when this world will be as nothing to you: when its opinions, its struggles, and its varied interests will hold no more place in your thoughts than last year's clouds. When memory, invested with preternatural power, will array before your mental gaze every action of your past lives. Then, gentlemen, at that awful moment, believe me, this verdict will not be forgotten; and if you have given it without due conviction of its justice, it will lie with the weight of mountains upon your souls. Let

779 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSThe prosecution presented its case, yet it was revealed that the English officer who captured these men was once indebted for his life to their leader. Mr. Quentin, while on the stand, stated that he had no doubt that when Capt. Trotter was in the hands of the negro king, he was saved by the intercession of Capt. Gibert. Throughout the trial, the jury found no evidence to support the portrayal of these men as the dangerous and bloodthirsty miscreants described in the charges against them. They were told that much

780 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:It seems to me that the whole aim of Perez was to give a deeper hue to the crime with which these prisoners were charged. The carrying of knives by Spanish sailors could excite no suspicion in the breast of anyone if it was a customary thing. We cannot account for such evidence in any other way than by believing that he feared, should these men be discharged, his own imprisonment might be protracted.Perez also tells you, gentlemen, that the carpenter stove the American boat with something heavy, like a piece of wood; and

781 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSYou will be convinced, upon a moment's reflection, that this could not have been the case.I may have tested your patience during my cross-examination, gentlemen. I might have been more detailed in minor particulars than prudence would typically dictate. If we had possessed any other means, this would not have been necessary. However, as it was, we could not obtain a ray of light except through the strictest scrutiny and closest examination.Perez initially tells you that the men on board wore both black and white shoes. Later, he claims he saw

782 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:760 X, AMERICAN STATE TRIALSThe probability of his having perjured himself by the suppression of important truths is significant.I will now call your attention to another aspect of this witness's testimony. He has stated that the carpenter set fire to a bag of powder in the hold. Would the witness himself be willing to try this experiment? Would the carpenter have succeeded in such an attempt and made his escape to the shore in safety? Is it not more probable that he would have been in another world before reaching his boat? Yet, the

783 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Pedro Gibert and OthersThe other witness, Quentin, affirmed positively that the guns were iron. Perez also mentioned that there was only one man and the third mate on board the Panda who spoke English, and that the former did not go on board the Mexican. Meanwhile, the crew of the latter vessel declared that several of the pirates spoke English fluently.The conduct of Captain Trotter did not suggest that he considered the prisoners to be pirates. He never kept them in chains long enough to maintain the pretense, if it was one, and even

784 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:752 X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSMr. Child referenced "Parliamentary Tables," by which he claimed he could demonstrate the type of individuals who had entered the British navy. He stated he could show the names of over 3,000 lieutenants, many of them veterans in service, who had been superseded by inexperienced youths.The Court stated that any established work of science could be quoted as evidence, but the mere opinions of a writer regarding the conduct of a government or individuals could not be admitted.Mr. Child argued that if an announcement had been made regarding the loss

785 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSIt is false, as all travelers positively assert, that Spanish dollars are current all over Africa. Their value, doubtless, differs in different parts of the coast, depending on how much the inhabitants may need other articles. And the money was buried! How is it that it remains hidden to this very day, with a fleet of British vessels on the coast? How is it that it is still in possession of the natives, despite the powerful arms of the British navy, led by Capt. Henry D. Trotter? Why, also, were the

786 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:754 X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALS.Such grounds as these, gentlemen, have never been seen in a case of piracy since the beginning of time. Is it a fact that Quentin did not know that the logbook or any of the papers were missing? Doubtless, all the books and papers fell into the same hands. I have no doubt that the logbook is now in the hands of the prosecutors. The schooner has always been known as a two-topsail schooner; as such, she was known in August 1832, in Havana, and also in Cadiz in 1833.

787 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Pedro Gibert and OthersThe possibility of the Panda encountering the Mexican was discussed, with a table of calculations presented to the jury. These calculations aimed to demonstrate that the schooner was significantly ahead of the brig at the time the robbery occurred.Regarding the prisoners' alleged involvement in the slave trade, it was argued that before this could be held against them, the government should ensure it approached the court with integrity. It was undeniable that, despite New Englanders' objections to this trade, the entire country was involved in it at the time. As recently

788 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:The labors involved in this case have been unprecedented. We can find no parallel to them in the history of judicial proceedings in this country. None of us have yet broken down under the strain, although many times our bodies have been weary and our hearts sick and faint. Still, I do not believe these labors should be a subject of regret when we consider the great importance of the case now to be decided. It is significant because it involves the lives of twelve men and the interests of public justice, not only

789 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSThe defendants have been instructed in matters of right; they have had counsel of their own selection; they have had the privilege of choosing their own jury from a large number of citizens collected from all parts of the vicinity. If ever there was a mode more calculated to secure the proper administration of justice, it is that adopted by us in this particular. They have had the advantage of the government's resources to procure any testimony within the process of the court. All witnesses whose testimony they desired are in

790 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:But, gentlemen, all the indulgences I have enumerated have been granted not to facilitate the escape of guilt, but to afford protection to the innocent. Otherwise, our laws would be a mockery, and our courts of justice merely a theater where the prize of eloquence is to be won, and where, instead of protecting the rights of our citizens, guilt might revel in crime and defy discovery more than in any other place.If the prisoners are innocent, none of you, gentlemen, I am sure, will regret the length of time and the great labor

791 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:On the 20th or 26th of August, a vessel commanded by Captain Gibert set sail, manned by a crew, part of whom were the prisoners at the bar. This fact was undeniable, as it was corroborated by the Custom House documents and the testimony of Perez and Guzman. Perez stated that the vessel sailed on the 20th or 26th, and the ship’s papers and Moro Pass, dated the 18th, lead us to believe that the voyage commenced on the 20th of August.The track of the Mexican vessel is before us, marked by the mate

792 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Diack, with a white streak, noted that she had two small guns and something resembling a gun covered up amidships. She estimated the vessel to be about one hundred and fifty tons burden. Regarding this latter item—the amount of tonnage—allowances must be made for the state of alarm into which Capt. Butman was thrown. Mr. Peyton has explained how difficult it is to judge the tonnage of a vessel; he mentioned that he and his messmates were, in one instance, unable to decide within fifty or sixty tons the burden of the vessel in

793 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSThe mate of the Mexican vessel and Perez both recount that the pirates took some spars, butter, and fowls from them. Perez observed this while in the maintop of the schooner. He also noted seeing smoke coming from the galley of the Mexican, and Captain Butman corroborates this by stating that his vessel was nearly set on fire. Witnesses from both vessels confirm that these events occurred on September 20th. Perez specifically mentions the 20th as the day the Panda captured the American brig, and the logbook of the Mexican records

794 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:At the time she was taken, what became of them after they left the vessel? They sought refuge among the negroes and in the forest. How different was the conduct of the Portuguese, who shipped at Prince’s Island and had no concern with the robbery. One of them went on board the Panda immediately after the English had taken possession of her, and the other sought a passage home in a vessel lying very near the Panda. From the instructions of the captain of the Panda, I believe the whole affair was a regular

795 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSPreviously, it was said that he could not read, yet he contradicted that assertion by reading in court. This circumstance would be one of the strongest proofs that he had testified truthfully. It would demonstrate that, however bad he was in other respects and whatever falsehoods he might have stated elsewhere, he had come into court on the present occasion with a full knowledge of his precarious situation. He was convinced that his life depended on his veracity and was determined to tell the truth, even if it meant contradicting anything

796 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:764 X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSThe gallantry with which they, upon all occasions, risked their lives in behalf of the general weal.November 24.JUDGE STORY'S CHARGEJudge Story:Gentlemen, this important and protracted case is now, I hope, drawing to a close. In terms of its duration and the extraordinary nature of the circumstances developed, it is without parallel in the history of our courts. Great diligence and exertion have been used to bring out the facts; those facts are now before the jury, and it is for you to decide as to the guilt or innocence of

797 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Many things, said Judge Story, had been brought into the present case which he regretted. However, the counsel for the defense had undoubtedly done right in omitting nothing that might have occurred to their minds as likely to benefit the prisoners. The jury had been presented with many cases to illustrate the difficulty of deciding upon the identity of individuals. Some of these cases might be founded in fact, or they might, for all anyone could say to the contrary, be figments of the imagination. They were commonplaces of the law and had been

798 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:766 X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSHow could we support our claims to property, or claims of any other kind, but by human testimony? The only purpose for which these cases ought ever to be called before a jury is as a caution. If they were urged further than this, it would be an urging of the jury to betray their duty. He regretted seeing them introduced into an American court because our tribunals are not characterized by a thirst for blood. On the contrary, if we have anything of which we can justly boast, it

799 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSLet them look at the conduct of Capt. Trotter. He was an officer of the British navy stationed on the coast of Africa, with directions to use his efforts in suppressing the slave trade. He was there discharging the particular duty assigned to him and was under no obligation to trouble himself about pirates. However, he received information about the robbery of the American brig and that the pirate was believed to be on the African coast. He immediately went in search of her. What motive could this gallant officer have

800 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:768 &X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSThe trial here was conducted with reference to certain suggestions and questions regarding whether money had been divided among the crew of the Curlew. This question was clear and understandable to everyone. As an individual, after the most careful examination, I must say that I found nothing in Captain Trotter's actions that a man in his position might not fairly do. The learned judge further stated, in reference to this matter, that if, in this first instance of national reciprocity, British officers found themselves accused without sufficient reason, it would

801 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSThe crime attempted to be destroyed by fire was obvious. The individuals, whoever they were, after committing the robbery, had resolved to consummate their crime by sacrificing every member of the crew, murdering those against whom they could have no personal animosity, and whom they had never before seen. It was a horrible crime; however, the horror it incited was not, at the present time, to weigh against these prisoners in the minds of the jury. The jury was first to determine if the prisoners were guilty.Judge Story then proceeded to

802 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:American State TrialsAs the American passed by the sufferers, the Spaniard stopped and saved them. However, the prisoner's guilt must outweigh all these considerations. We cannot dispense mercy; that is the attribute of a higher power. You and I, gentlemen, are bound to do our duty according to the law, and we would be false to our oaths, our country, and our God if we were to shut our eyes to the force of the testimony before us.The concluding part of the charge was very favorable to Portana, Velasquez, and Ferrer. No participation whatsoever,

803 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:PEDRO GIBERT AND OTHERSFor years, more than one or two of the Southern States resisted. Congress could do no more than it did at the time of the formation of the Constitution. They wished to have prohibited the traffic at once, but there were opposing interests to be reconciled, and they had no other alternative than to sacrifice the Constitution or submit to a limited evil. They had many prejudices to overcome, and had they not secured the Constitution by a temporary sacrifice of their wishes, they never would have been able to destroy

804 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:The Clerk: Jurors, look upon the prisoner; prisoner, look upon the jurors. How say you, gentlemen, is the prisoner at the bar, Pedro Gibert, guilty or not guilty?The Foreman: Guilty.The same verdict was pronounced against De Soto (the mate), Ruiz (the carpenter), Boyga, Castille, Garcia, and Montenegro. However, Costa (the cabin boy), Ferrer (the negro), Guzman, Portana, and Velasquez were declared not guilty.The Foreman read to the Court the following recommendation to mercy:"The sympathies of the jury have been strongly moved in behalf of Bernardo De Soto, on account of his generous, noble, and

805 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THE EXECUTIONDelargo committed suicide in Salem Jail before the trial. After the conviction, Da Soto, the first mate, was pardoned through the intercession of Mrs. David Lee Child, the wife of the counsel. A strong point in his favor was his bravery in rescuing a vessel under circumstances of great peril, along with her crew and passengers, consisting of women and children, as she lay aground on the Bahama Banks.The others were hanged at the Leverett Street Jail, and many people came in boats to witness the execution, which I saw. Boyga cut his

806 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:The Trial of Thomas Cooper for Seditious Libel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1800The NarrativeThomas Cooper was an Englishman who had inherited a good fortune. He was trained as a lawyer but spent more time experimenting with acids and gases than studying law books or preparing legal briefs. His interest in chemistry eventually led him to master the subject.Cooper, Thomas (1759-1840), was born in London, England. He was educated at Oxford, studied law, and then turned to the natural sciences, particularly chemistry, over which he soon obtained mastery. However, he ventured into politics and fell out of

807 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Thomas Cooper drifted into metaphysics, and from metaphysics, he transitioned to politics. In politics, he became so unpopular in England that he emigrated to the United States. Here, he began practicing law. Despite being an earnest Republican, a scholar, and a man of unquestionable ability, his clients were few. Consequently, he found himself needing to seek a government position. In 1797, the office of agent for American claims under the English treaty became vacant. His friend, Dr.Previously, he had been accused of various judicial misconducts. These included committing constables who refused to serve them,

808 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:James Priestley suggested to him to apply for the position. Objections were raised that he was not a native and did not share the President's political views. Dr. Priestley considered such objections insignificant. He argued that if Mr. Adams intended to be the ruler of a nation and not merely the leader of a party, he would welcome the opportunity to demonstrate it. Consequently, Dr. Priestley wrote a letter to the President, presenting Cooper's name for the position. Cooper also sent a letter himself. However, the office was given to someone else, and no

809 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Thomas CooperThomas Cooper was once asked if he was the same editor attacking the President who had previously sought office from the very man he now criticized. Cooper confirmed that he was indeed the same person and saw nothing improper in his actions. According to him, it was not he who had changed, but John Adams. In 1797, the President "was hardly in the infancy of political mistakes." At that time, Adams had not yet declared that a Republican government might mean anything; he had not sanctioned the Alien and Sedition Acts or the

810 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:### The TrialIn the United States Circuit Court, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1800.**Hon. Samuel Chase,****Hon. Richard Peters,**JudgesApril 11An indictment had been found against Thomas Cooper under the Sedition Act, which made it a crime to be punished by fine and imprisonment for anyone to print or publish any false, scandalous, and malicious writings against the Government, Congress, or the President, with intent to defame them, to bring them into contempt, or to excite the hatred of the people against them. This was for the following seditious libel against John Adams, President of the United States.The libelous

811 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPERThe case of Jonathan Robbins is a melancholy example of presidential overreach. As President of the United States, an individual interfered to influence the decisions of a court of justice—a stretch of authority that even the monarch of Great Britain would have hesitated to undertake. This interference was unprecedented, against the law, and devoid of mercy. Jonathan Robbins, a native citizen of America, was forcibly impressed by the British and delivered, with the advice of Mr. Adams, to the mock trial of a British court-martial. This case had not yet shocked the republican

812 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Dr. Priestley exerted his influence in dispersing this very address, which he must have known was the offspring of disappointment and revenge.The address is as cunning and insidious a production as ever appeared in the Aurora or the old Chronicle, and as for impudence, it exceeds, or at least equals, Porcupine himself. Priestley and Cooper are both called upon to deny the above narrative. A recourse to the letters themselves would establish the accuracy of this anecdote, even to a syllable.Yes, I am the Thomas Cooper alluded to—luckily possessed of more accurate information than

813 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPERDr. Priestley had a conversation with me, urging me to ensure that Mr. Adams did not misunderstand my political views. As a result of this conversation, Dr. Priestley wrote the following letter, not a few months ago, but over two years ago.August 12, 1797Dear Sir,It was far from my intention or wish to trouble you with the request for any favors, even though it is now within your power to grant them. It is not at all probable that I shall ever take a second liberty of this kind. However, circumstances have arisen

814 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Is this the letter of a man or not? I do not appeal to the cowardly propagator of anonymous falsehoods, but to the public. What is there in it of vanity or servility? Do not these letters take for granted that I am a Democrat, though not a disturber of all government? And that what I am, I shall remain, even though it be deemed a reasonable objection to my appointment? Is this, or is this not, adhering to my principle, whatever becomes of my interest?Nor is it true that my address originated from

815 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPERA case too little known, but of which the people ought to be fully apprised before the election, and they shall be.Most assuredly, had these transactions taken place in August 1797, then President Adams would not have been troubled by any request from Thomas Cooper.Northumberland, Nov. 2, 1797.The prisoner, without counsel, appeared on his own behalf and pleaded not guilty. The jury was then selected.William Rawle, District Attorney, represented the United States.At the outset, a question arose concerning the right of the prisoner to compel the attendance of several members of Congress (as

816 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:It was with great regret that it was observed that anyone with a moderate ability to write believed they had the right to attack and undermine the authorities and officers appointed by the people of this country. It was intolerable that vile and infamous falsehoods could be uttered and published with impunity against the President of the United States, whom the people themselves had placed in that high office, and in which he has acted with much credit to himself and benefit to them.Thomas Cooper stands charged in the indictment as follows—(here Mr. R.

817 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPERThe confidence of the people, so necessary for conducting public business, was in direct opposition to the duties of a good citizen. Mischiefs of this kind were to be dreaded in proportion to how uninformed the surrounding country was. A man of sense and education had more power to extend the mischief he was inclined to propagate. The government should not encourage the idea that they would not prosecute such atrocious conduct. If this conduct were allowed to pass, the peace of the country would be endangered.Error leads to discontent, discontent to a

818 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:786 X¥. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSIf my motives were to publish a foul and infamous libel on the character of the President, to incite hatred and contempt against him among the people of this country through gross and malicious falsehoods, then indeed it would be my duty to be brought before this tribunal. It would be yours to convict, and the duty of the court to punish me.However, I hope that during the course of this trial, I will be able to prove to your satisfaction that I have published nothing that truth will not

819 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPERThe other too little influence on the measures of government. One is friendly, the other hostile, to a standing army and a permanent navy. One believes they are necessary to repel invasions and aggressions from without, and commotion within; the other believes that a well-organized militia is a sufficient safeguard for all that an army could protect, and that a navy is more dangerous and expensive than any benefit derived from it can compensate. One thinks the liberties of our country are endangered by licentiousness, the other by the restrictions of the press.

820 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:788 ZX. AMERICAN STATE TRIALS.Alluded to in the indictment, you will reverence as you ought the sacred obligation of the oath you have taken.Gentlemen of the jury, I acknowledge, as freely as any of you can, the necessity of a certain degree of confidence in the executive government of the country. However, this confidence ought not to be unlimited and need not be paid in advance; let it be earned before it is reposed. Let it be claimed by the evidence of benefits conferred, by measures that compel approbation, and by conduct that is

821 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPERClose all the avenues of information and throw a veil over the grossest misconduct of our periodical rulers?After offering these preliminary remarks, I shall give an account of the paper on which I am accused and then proceed to examine the charges of the indictment in the order in which they are laid. Much that I intended to advance I must relinquish, so as not to trespass too long on your time or weaken the effect of my own defense by fatiguing your attention.The sacred paper now handed to me by the Attorney

822 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:790 X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALS.In this paper, which you will have before you when you retire, I shall not read at length. This application was from one friend to another; on the face of it, a confidential communication, although containing nothing but what might do credit to all the parties concerned. Mr. Adams, however, did not consider it so confidential, and from some disclosure on his part, has arisen the base and cowardly slander that initially dragged me before the public to vindicate my moral and political character. It has now brought me before

823 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPERMay it be considered seditious to say the President is mistaken? Before you can condemn me for this kind of sedition, you must become Catholic believers in this new-fangled doctrine of infallibility. I know that in England the king can do no wrong, but I did not know until now that the President of the United States had the same attribute.I have said (and I am accused of saying it) that "even those who doubted his capacity thought well of his intentions." Is it a crime to doubt the capacity of the President?

824 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:792 XY. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSAnother, in a form more portable and convenient, purports to be a selection of addresses and answers to and from the President during the summer of 1798. Not having been able to procure official copies of the documents I wished to refer to, I must offer in evidence such publications as I can find. These are the types of publications upon which, in fact, the public mind is usually made up and upon whose authority the electors of this country determine the characters whom they honor with their suffrage.Indeed, if

825 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPER, 793Where there is no reasonable suspicion or assignable motive for why the publications I offer should misrepresent the transactions I allude to, the probability is in favor of their accuracy. This is especially true when the printers of these publications are severely punishable for willful misrepresentation or gross mistakes in detailing the public acts of government.Judge Peters: I admit a great many things from Mr. Cooper, who is without counsel, which I would not admit from others.Judge Chase: You may read anything and everything you please.Mr. Cooper went on to argue at

826 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Gentlemen, if the assertions I have made are true, whatever the motives behind them may be, you cannot find me guilty. I believe it is impossible, if you consider the paper as a whole, to attribute its publication to malice. It is not voluntary but compelled by the force of circumstances. At the very outset of the paper, I spoke well of the President. I have been in the habit of thinking his intentions are right, though his public conduct is wrong. I believe I can even now bring enough proof from among my

827 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:In the act which defines this offense and outlines the punishment, a liberality of defense is provided, which is unknown, I believe, in any other country where the party is tried for a libel on the government. Here, under the third section of that act, the defendant is allowed to present evidence of the truth of the matters charged as a libel in the publication. The jury has the right to determine the law and the facts under the direction of the court. The true spirit of the law is that the defendant shall

828 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Gentlemen, if the assertions I have made are true, whatever the motives behind them may be, you cannot find me guilty. I believe it is impossible, if you consider the paper in its entirety, to ascribe its publication to malice. It is not voluntary but compelled. At the very outset of the paper, I spoke well of the President. I have been in the habit of thinking his intentions are right, but his public conduct is wrong. I believe I can even now bring enough proof from among my friends and neighbors to support

829 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:In the act that defines this offense and outlines the punishment, a level of defense is provided that is, I believe, unknown in any other country where the party is tried for a libel against the government. Here, under the third section of that act, the defendant is allowed to present evidence of the truth of the matters charged as a libel in the publication. The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts under the direction of the court. The true spirit of the law is that the defendant

830 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Gentlemen, if the assertions I have made are true, whatever the motives behind them may be, you cannot find me guilty. I believe it is impossible, if you consider the paper in its entirety, to ascribe the publication of it to malice. It is not voluntary but compelled. At the very outset of the paper, I have spoken well of the President. I have been in the habit of thinking his intentions are right, even if his public conduct is wrong. I believe I can even now bring enough proof from among my friends

831 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:In the act that defines this offense and outlines the punishment, a level of defense is provided that is, to my knowledge, unknown in any other country where a party is tried for libel against the government. Here, under the third section of that act, the defendant is allowed to present evidence of the truth of the matters charged as libel in the publication. The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts under the court's direction. The true spirit of the law is that the defendant shall not be

832 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:794 XY. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSGentlemen, if the assertions I have made are true, whatever the motives behind them may be, you cannot find me guilty. But I think it is impossible, if you consider the paper altogether, that you can ascribe the publication of it to malice. It is not voluntary but compelled. At the very outset of the paper, I have spoken well of the President. I have been in the habit of thinking his intentions are right, but his public conduct is wrong. I believe I can even now bring enough proof

833 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:In the act that defines this offense and outlines the punishment, a level of defense is provided that is, to my knowledge, unknown in any other country where a party is tried for libel against the government. Here, under the third section of that act, the defendant is allowed to present evidence of the truth of the matters charged as libel in the publication. Furthermore, the jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts under the court's direction. The true spirit of the law is that the defendant shall not

834 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Gentlemen, if the assertions I have made are true, whatever the motives behind them may be, you cannot find me guilty. I believe it is impossible, if you consider the paper in its entirety, to attribute its publication to malice. The force behind it is not voluntary, but compelled. At the very outset of the paper, I spoke well of the President. I have been in the habit of thinking his intentions are right, though his public conduct is wrong. I believe I can even now bring enough proof from among my friends and

835 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:In the act that defines this offense and outlines the punishment, a level of defense is provided that is, to my knowledge, unknown in any other country where a party is tried for a libel against the government. Here, the defendant is allowed, under the third section of that act, to present evidence of the truth of the matters charged as a libel in the publication. The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts under the direction of the court. The true spirit of the law is that the

836 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:The text clearly demonstrates a settled intention to persuade the public that the President of the United States is unfit for the high office he holds. You must be fully convinced of this from the entire tenor of the expressions presented to you in the indictment.It is far from my intention to press hard on any part of his lengthy address to you or to exploit any unguarded expression that he might have omitted or corrected upon more deliberate consideration. However, I cannot help but notice from the overall tone of his current argument,

837 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPERThroughout the quotations he has made, particularly from the addresses to the President and the answers to them, there has been a series of misrepresentations. It will be my duty to address these when I consider that part of the charge and his vindication of it. It is fair to observe that if, from the perusal of partial extracts and passages selected from various publications, he has thought it proper to publish a libel, such as that for which he is indicted, against the character of our President, there is no excuse for

838 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:798 X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSThe defendant aimed to justify his own conduct and language throughout. You, gentlemen of the jury, under the direction of the court, will decide whether he has presented to you such a justification as will entitle him to your verdict in his favor.THE CHARGE TO THE JURYJudge's Charge: Gentlemen of the jury, when individuals are found rash enough to commit an offense such as the one the defendant is charged with, it becomes the duty of the government to ensure they do not go unpunished. It is my duty to

839 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPERLibels against themselves. If a man attempts to destroy the confidence of the people in their officers, their supreme magistrate, and their legislature, he effectively undermines the foundation of the government. A republican government can only be destroyed in two ways: the introduction of luxury or the licentiousness of the press. The latter is the slower but most certain means of bringing about the destruction of the government. The legislature of this country, knowing this maxim, has thought it proper to pass a law to check this licentiousness of the press. By a

840 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:800 X, AMERICAN STATE TRIALSThe import of the publication is significant since the offense is committed by the two coupled together.First, let's address the publication.The fact of writing and publishing is clearly proven; in fact, it is not denied. It is proven to have taken place at Sunbury, a considerable distance from the seat of government. Evidence shows that the traverser went to the house of a justice of the peace with this paper, whom, of all others, he ought to have avoided. He must have known that it was the duty of the

841 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPERThe duties of his high station render him unfit for the important office to which the people have elected him. The motives and intent of the defendant, not the President, are the subjects to be inquired into by you.Now, let us consider this libel as published by the defendant and examine his motives. You will find the defendant speaking of the President in the following words: "Even those who doubted his capacity thought well of his intentions." The defendant might have supposed this to be a compliment regarding the President's intentions, but I

842 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Ladies and gentlemen, again, if you believe this, what opinion can you form of the President? Certainly, the worst you can form. You would certainly consider him totally unfit for the high station which he has so honorably filled, and with such benefit to his country.The traverser states that, under the auspices of the President, "our credit is so low that we are obliged to borrow money at eight percent in time of peace." I cannot suppress my feelings at this gross attack upon the President. Can this be true? Can you believe it?

843 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPERFrom: an interference without precedent, against law and against mercy. Is not this an attack and a most serious attack on the character of the President?The traverser goes on thus: "This melancholy case of Jonathan Robbins, a native of America, forcibly impressed by the British, and delivered, with the advice of Mr. Adams, to the mock trial of a British court martial, had not yet astonished the republican citizens of this free country. A case too little known, but of which the people ought to be fully apprised before the election, and they

844 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:804 ¢ X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALS.Liberties. They should be under no influence—they are only accountable to God and their own consciences—your present judges are in that situation.There is a small circumstance which the Attorney General, in his observations to you, omitted to state, but which I think it is right to recall to your recollection, as it reveals the intent behind the traverser's publication. In his allusion to Jonathan Robbins, he expressly tells you this is "a case too little known, but of which the people ought to be fully apprised before the election,

845 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPER. 805Countries of the other, provided this shall be done only on such evidence of criminality as, according to the laws of the place where the fugitive or person so charged shall be found, would justify his apprehension and commitment for trial if the offense had been there committed. If the President, therefore, by this treaty, was bound to give this Nash up to justice, he was so bound by law; for the treaty is the law of the land. If so, the charge of interference to influence the decisions of a court

846 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:No court of justice here has jurisdiction over the crime of murder committed on board a British ship of war. When the British government requested the President to deliver this man up, it became necessary to determine whether there was sufficient evidence of his criminality pursuant to the treaty. Consequently, the judge of the court of Carolina was called upon to inquire into the evidence of his criminality. He acted as the instrument used by the President to ascertain that fact.The delivery of the accused was a necessary act of the President, which he

847 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPERFrance—neither of these can, with any propriety, be called a standing army. In fact, we cannot have a standing army in this country, as the Constitution has expressly declared that no appropriation shall be made for the support of an army longer than two years. Therefore, since Congress may appropriate money for the support of the army annually and are obliged to do it only for two years, there can be no standing army in this country until the Constitution is first destroyed.There is no subject on which the people of America feel

848 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:808 X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALS.Expressions of attachment and confidence in the President, along with a determination to resist the oppression of the French government, were conveyed through various addresses. The President replied to these addresses with responses that generally echoed their sentiments. In fact, his expressions were as general as the nature of the addresses would permit. Therefore, the traverser ought to have blamed the addressers, not the President. For instance, the Marine Society of Boston, composed of seasoned seamen, addressed the President in favor of a navy. In reply, the President agreed that

849 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPERUnited States, you must acquit him; if he has proved the truth of the facts asserted by him, you must find him not guilty.THE VERDICT AND SENTENCEThe jury retired and returned with a verdict of guilty.Judge Chase: Mr. Cooper, as the jury has found you guilty, we wish to hear any circumstances you have to offer in mitigation of the fine the court may think proper to impose on you, and also in extenuation of your punishment. We would therefore like to know your situation in life, particularly regarding your circumstances. It will

850 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:I am sorry you did not think it proper to make an affidavit regarding your circumstances. You are a perfect stranger to the court, at least to me. I do not know you personally—I know nothing of you beyond having recently heard your name mentioned in some publication. Everyone is aware of the political disputes that have existed among us. It is well-known that there are two parties in the country; you have stated this yourself. You have taken one side—we do not claim that you do not have the right to express your

851 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:THOMAS COOPERYou, the jury, have found otherwise. You are a gentleman of the profession, possessing such capacity and knowledge that it is more within your power to mislead the ignorant. I do not wish to oppress, but I will restrain, as far as I can, all such licentious attacks on the government of the country.Mr. Cooper, I have been asked by the court whether, in the case of a fine being imposed upon me, I shall be supported by a party. Sir, I solemnly aver that throughout my life, here and elsewhere, among all

852 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:B12 X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSI have hitherto neither accepted nor rejected the offers. If the court imposes a fine beyond my ability to pay, I shall accept them without hesitation. However, if the fine is within my means to discharge, I shall pay it myself. The insinuations of the court are unfounded, and if you, sir, have been tempted by misapprehension or misinformation to make them, your mistake should be corrected.Judge Perkins: I believe we have nothing to do with parties; we are only to consider the subject before us. I wish you had

853 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:The Trial of James Thompson Callender for Seditious Libel, Richmond, Virginia, 1800The NarrativeThis was the last of the great trials under the Federal Sedition Act and the most celebrated. The libel was directed against the President of the United States, and the tempest which the trial excited, as Dr. Wharton notes, can now hardly be understood. Virginia had joined Kentucky in declaring the law void within her borders, viewing it as a menace to the freedom of the press and a breach of the liberties guaranteed by the Constitution. There was no popular sympathy

854 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:James Callender was a notorious literary hack, whose scurrilous pen was at the service of the highest bidder. To read his book, "The Prospect Before Us," and claim the writer was not guilty of sedition was impossible. However, what became of Callender was of little consequence, as everyone knew the real contest would be between the Republican lawyers of the Virginia bar and Judge Samuel Chase. Chase was the most reckless, partisan, and fearless judge on the bench of the Circuit Court.Long before the trial opened, statements were made and sworn to that Chase

855 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERThe reckless conduct of Judge Chase in the courtroom can only be explained by his awareness that it was to be a struggle to the death between himself and the distinguished lawyers Virginia had sent against him: Edmund Randolph, George Hay, William Wirt, and Philip Nicholas.The indictment made no mention of the book "The Prospect Before Us." Instead, a few sentences, by no means the bitterest that could be found, were chosen as the basis of the case. Callender wrote that the reign of Mr. Adams had been one continuous tempest of

856 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Then Chase grew angry and, as he would have said, took the lawyers in hand. When Mr. Hay argued that Giles' evidence would help determine whether Callender's pamphlet consisted of libelous statements or merely questions of opinion—matters that the jury would need to consider when assessing the fine—Chase thundered, "That is a wild notion; it is not the law," and ordered the jury to be empaneled and the trial to proceed.Mr. Nicholas challenged the entire panel of jurors, but he was flouted and routed with a finality that not only overruled his objections but

857 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERThe prosecution, having established that the prisoner was the author of "The Prospect Before Us," introduced the entire pamphlet as evidence. The defense protested, arguing that only the sections cited in the indictment should be considered by the jury. This was especially pertinent given the court's decision that the jurors were only concerned with the specific offense charged in the official documents and should not be influenced by any prejudices against the pamphlet as a whole. However, the judge countered that the prisoner was on trial for writing "The Prospect Before Us"

858 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:818 X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSThe defense attempted to take advantage of the existing prejudice against the Sedition Law. However, when Mr. Wirt began to argue against the constitutionality of the law, Judge Chase ordered him to his seat, and he quietly obeyed."Hear my words!" shouted the Judge. "I wish the world to know them! My opinion is the result of mature deliberation!"No sooner had Chase concluded his pompous proclamation than Mr. Wirt once more turned to the jury. Quoting directly from the third section of the Sedition Act, which provided that the jury "should

859 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERJames Thompson Callender was fined two hundred dollars and required to find sureties for good behavior for a period of two years.Five years later, Chase was impeached before the Senate of the United States for oppressive and vexatious conduct during the trial and indecent solicitude for the conviction of the accused.THE TRIALIn the United States Circuit Court, District of Virginia, Richmond, June 1800.Hon. Samuel Chase and Hon. Cyrus Griffin, Judges.On May 28, James Thompson Callender was indicted under the Sedition Law by a grand jury for a seditious libel upon John Adams,

860 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:The same system of persecution has been extended all over the continent. Every person holding an office must either quit it or think and vote exactly with Mr. Adams. Adams and Washington have since been shaping a series of these paper jobbers into judges and ambassadors, as their whole courage lies in a lack of shame. These poltroons, without risking a manly and intelligible defense of their own measures, raise an affected yelp against the corruption of the French Directory, as if any corruption could be more venal, more notorious, or more execrated than

861 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDER, 821Twenty-five thousand dollars a year, with the petty parade of his birthday, with the importance of his name sticking in every other page of the statute book. Alas! he is not an object of envy, but of compassion and horror. With Connecticut more than half undeceived, with Pennsylvania disgusted, with Virginia alarmed, and with Kentucky holding him in defiance, having renounced all his original principles and affronted all his honest friends, he cannot enjoy the sweet slumbers of innocence. He cannot hope to feel the most exquisitely delightful sensation that ever

862 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Mr. Nickolas presented an affidavit made by the prisoner and moved for a continuance. The affidavit alleged that the following persons are material witnesses in his defense: William Gardner of Portsmouth; Tench Coxe of Philadelphia; Judge Bee of South Carolina; Timothy Pickering, late of Philadelphia; William B. Giles of the County of Amelia; and Gen. Blackburn of the County of Bath.He expects to prove by William Gardner that he was the Commissioner of Loans for the State of New Hampshire under the government of the United States and that he was removed from the

863 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDER, 823James Thompson Callender claims that he can prove, through William B. Giles, that the President of the United States has expressed in conversation with him a sentiment to the effect that he believed the executive department of the United States ought to be vested with the power to direct and control the public will.He believes he will be able to prove, through General Blackburn, that he received an address from John Adams, President of the United States, in response to the field officers of Bath County. In this address, the President

864 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:The Court had declared the evidence of Mr. Giles to be material, not only in express terms but also by a partial postponement, implying that the trial should not proceed until his personal attendance could be secured.Mr. Hay then requested the Court's attention to additional reasons that convinced him the motion should be granted. The laws and customs of the State of Virginia supported the motion. In this state, when an indictment for misdemeanor is found, the party is not immediately arrested and brought into court; instead, a summons is issued, returnable to the

865 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:James Thompson CallenderThe second section of the sedition law made falsehood, as well as scandal and malice, an essential part of every libel. By the last sentence, the party accused is allowed to show in his justification the truth of the matter charged to be libelous.He would not pretend to say definitively what ought to be the construction of that law. However, the opinion he had been able to form after a very short consideration of the subject was that the object of the law was to punish a man not for abuse nor

866 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:826 X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSWhen one accused another of being a thief, the accuser could support the charge by proving that the accused had taken property secretly, without the consent or knowledge of the owner. Regarding evidence in such a matter, all people of common understanding would form the same opinion. However, what kind of evidence would be necessary to prove the initial words of the indictment, that the reign of Mr. Adams had been one continuous tempest of malignant passions? The circumstances to which the writer might allude, and which convinced him that

867 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERDifferent political opinions, furnished with the same materials of information, would form conclusions diametrically opposite. Let them take for their guide the vindication of the Constitution of the United States. Many were perfectly satisfied that the President of the United States, instead of approving the Federal Constitution, was of the opinion that a government composed of an hereditary chief magistrate, a Senate, and a House of Commons or representatives chosen by the people, was better calculated than any other to secure the liberties and promote the happiness of the people. I will

868 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:828 X, AMERICAN STATE TRIALSThe defendant wished that the executive had the power to control the public will.This testimony, when compared with the President's records, will substantiate the charges in the book written by Mr. Callender. It strongly supports the charges in dispute and directly addresses the part of the indictment where the President is accused of being a professed aristocrat. It has been stated that, although there are nineteen charges in the indictment against the defendant, even if we prove eighteen of them to be true, he must still be found guilty because

869 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERIt is crucial to demonstrate that the decision is right; for if the defendant is found guilty when his witnesses are absent and counsel unprepared, the verdict will not satisfy the public mind of his guilt.Jvupez CaseIt is wholly improper to revisit the former motion. Gentlemen, you misapprehend the intention of the court in postponing the case until today—you ought to confine yourselves to the present motion. Two reasons are given for postponing the trial: first, that Mr. Giles is absent, and it is inferred that the court, by not ruling a

870 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:The counsel are unprepared to defend the traverser. You show yourselves to be men of ability, and there is no difficulty in the cause; but you say that you are not ready to discuss the difference between fact and opinion. You argue that the charges in the indictment are merely opinions and not facts falsely asserted. Must there be a departure from common sense to find a construction favorable to the traverser? This construction admits the publication but denies its criminality.If the traverser certainly published that defamatory paper, read it and consider it. Can

871 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDEROn the second trial, every juryman was called to say whether he had formed any opinion on the subject or not.Judge Chase: My interpretation of the law is quite the contrary. I have always seen triers sworn to decide these questions. How is this done in your country? Challenges for favor must be decided by triers. I suppose there must be triers sworn.Mr. Nicholas: I believe the books lay down this distinction. Challenges to the array are either principal challenges or challenges for favor. Causes for principal challenges are always tried by

872 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:The first juror was sworn in, and the Judge put the following question to him: "Have you ever formed and delivered an opinion upon the charges contained in the indictment?" The juror answered that he had never seen the indictment nor heard it read. The Judge then said he must be sworn in chief.Mr. Hay asked for permission to put a question to the juror before he was sworn in chief.The Judge wanted to know what sort of question Mr. Hay intended to ask and told him he must first hear the question. If

873 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERThe book was published with the charges that were false, scandalous, and malicious, and it was claimed that they were written with the intent to defame. It was stated that if he could prove the charges, he must be acquitted. The same question, "whether they had formed and delivered an opinion on the charges against the traverser," was put by the judge to eight of the other jurymen successively before they were sworn in chief, and they all answered in the negative.Mr. Hoy said that it was unnecessary to put this question

874 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:The text accuses the President of the United States of converting to a presidential system that leads to a French war, an American navy, a large standing army, an additional load of taxes, and all other symptoms and consequences of debt and despotism. It also includes false, scandalous, and malicious words suggesting that "the same system of persecution has been extended all over the continent, and every person holding an office must either quit it or think and vote exactly with Mr. Adams," referring to the President of the United States.Furthermore, it accuses Mr.

875 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERThere is distinct and additional evidence that he was determined, at all events, to embroil this country with France. Furthermore, the false, scandalous, and malicious words of the tenor and effect following, that is to say, "Mr. Adams" (meaning the said President of the United States) "has only completed the scene of ignominy which Mr. Washington began."Additionally, the false, scandalous, and malicious words of the tenor and effect following, that is to say, "This last presidential" (meaning the said President of the United States) "felony will be buried by Congress in the

876 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:President of the United States, with his (meaning the said President) twenty-five thousand dollars a year, with the petty parade of his (meaning the said President) birthday, with the importance of his (meaning the said President) name sticking in every other page of the statute book. Alas! he (meaning the said President of the United States) is not an object of envy, but of compassion and horror. With Connecticut more than half undeceived, with Pennsylvania disgusted, with Virginia alarmed, with Kentucky holding him (meaning the said President) in defiance, having renounced all his original

877 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:James Thompson Callender, in the pursuit of defaming the President of the United States and intending to bring him into contempt and disrepute, sought to incite hatred among the good people against him. Within the district and jurisdiction of this court, he wickedly and maliciously caused, or procured, the printing and publishing of a false, scandalous, and malicious writing against the President of the United States. The content of this writing was as follows:"The reign of Mr. Adams (meaning John Adams, Esquire, President of the United States) has hitherto been one continual tempest of

878 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:838 X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSObscurity or shine in want, ask Mr. Adams (meaning the said President of the United States) whether it was proper to heap so many myriads of dollars upon William Smith, a paper jobber, who next to Hamilton and himself (meaning the said President of the United States) is perhaps the most detested character on the continent (meaning the United States of America).And also the false, scandalous, and malicious words of the tenor and effect following: "You (meaning the people of the United States) will then take your choice between innocence

879 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERUnited States] to plunge his country into the most expensive and ruinous establishments. In the first two years of his presidency, he has contrived pretenses to double the annual expenses of government by useless fleets, armies, sinecures, and jobs of every possible description.And also the false, scandalous, and malicious words of the tenor and effect following, that is to say: “By sending these ambassadors to Paris, Mr. Adams and his British faction, designed to do nothing but mischief."And also the false, scandalous, and malicious words of the tenor and effect following, that

880 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:American State TrialsEfforts for provoking a French war. And also the false, scandalous, and malicious words of the tenor and effect following, that is to say: "For although Mr. Adams were to make a treaty with France, yet such is the grossness of his prejudice, and so great is the violence of his passions that under his administration, America would be in constant danger of a second quarrel."Also, the false, scandalous, and malicious words of the tenor and effect following, that is to say: "When a chief magistrate is both in his speeches and

881 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDER, 841Consider the hatred of the good people of the United States towards him. It will be for you, gentlemen of the jury, in this case, to determine whether the traverser has, or has not, been the publisher of this paper. Once this point is ascertained, it will be for you to consider with what intent and for what purpose a paper like this has been composed and published.If you believe it to be a candid and fair discussion of constitutional subjects, real grievances, or political opinions and principles generally, you will

882 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:AMERICAN STATE TRIALSThe court would like to make it known to those who are in any way implicated that they are not obligated to incriminate themselves. They may withhold any part of their evidence that has a tendency to incriminate them if they think it proper.**Judge Chase:** This is correct. Every person involved in the publication is protected by law from being compelled to incriminate themselves. However, I suppose if any of them provide evidence, the Government of the United States is pledged not to initiate a prosecution against them. They can be assured

883 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERThe handwriting of Mr. Callender has been verified. I have seen Mr. Callender write; he once took the debates in the House of Assembly for me.(The book and manuscript sheets were compared and found to correspond.)**Meriwether Jones**: I had never read the book until after the presentment was made, except for a few passages, and perhaps about thirty-three pages. Not a word of it was printed at my office, though I sold some of the copies for the benefit of Mr. Callender. I only possessed one copy, which I found where Mr.

884 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:My stating to the court the reasons which have led me to this conclusion may subject me to the imputation which has more than once fallen from the bench. It has been the pleasure of the court to observe that the defense has been conceived and continued in error. What I am about to say will not, perhaps, induce the court to change that opinion. It is with great diffidence that I address the court on a subject which I have not had sufficient leisure to investigate. If, unfortunately, my conception of this law

885 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDER, 845A prosecution by information was initiated against the Chevalier De Ou for publishing a libel against the Count de Guerehy, ambassador from France. The prosecution commenced in the Court of King's Bench. The information states the title and the name of the libel fully and literally, as it was published in French, and then provides the translation in English at full length. I present these cases to demonstrate what the practice is; and it is an observation of one of the best judges who ever sat in the King's Bench, Lord

886 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:In the case of American State Trials, if the charge is not accurately specified, it becomes impossible for the defendant to properly defend themselves. Evidence pertaining to either case might be presented in support of this indictment.Had the indictment charged him with publishing a book entitled "The Prospect Before Us," he would have known with absolute certainty and clarity (by the copy provided to him) what was meant to be proved against him and what was necessary for him to prove in his own defense. As this is not the case, and since he

887 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERJudge Chase requested Mr. Hay to point out the specific parts of the authorities he referred to, on which he relied to establish his doctrine.Mr. Hay responded, "If the court will have a little patience, I will find the places."Judge Chase replied, "I will have a great deal."Mr. Hay continued, "The authorities I rely on are Hawkins’ Pleas of the Crown and Salkeld’s Reports, page 660. In this last book, it is adjudged that when an indictment uses the words 'secundum tenorem et effectum,' it binds the prosecutor to a literal recital;

888 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:President of the United States, and to bring him into contempt and disrepute, and to excite the hatred of the good people of the United States against him, did wickedly and maliciously write, print, utter, and publish a false, scandalous, and malicious writing against the President of the United States, of the tenor and effect following, that is to say: "The reign of Mr. Adams has hitherto been one continued tempest, etc."Now, what is the law? The act of Congress provides, among other things, that "if any person shall write, print, utter, or publish,

889 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:The purpose of requiring that the charge against a defendant be explicit is to ensure that the defendant can clearly comprehend it and be prepared to make a defense. It is not necessary for this purpose to recite the name of the libel. The charge against the defendant is very explicit, and he understands it well and is prepared to defend it. However, it is no criticism of his counsel that they argue this point in his favor.You further argue, on the supposition that if a subsequent prosecution were to be instituted for the

890 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:850° X. American State TrialsThe title must be copied in the indictment verbatim et literatim. I wonder you did not add et punctuation also. There is no real variance, and there is an end to the objection. You are mistaken. I pronounce this to be the law, and I shall instruct the jury that they may find the traverser guilty of part of the charges and acquit him of those not proved.It is not necessary for the attorney for the United States to make any reply, as there is no good reason to exclude

891 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERMr. Nelson, although the paper is long and complicated, the testimony is not so. The testimony, as I stated to you before, is concise, plain, and correct. If there be a man who, now that he has heard that testimony, entertains a doubt......almost any which the old confederation ever endured. The tardiness and timidity of Mr. Washington were succeeded by the indolence of Adams.Idem: "Under the old confederation, matters never were, nor could have been conducted so wretchedly as they actually are, and have been under the successive monarchs of Braintree and

892 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Whether this libel was published by the traverser, it will be useless for me to address him. If there is a man who doubts on that point, his mind must be impervious to the traits of truth; his mind must be panoplied over with doubt and skepticism.The blockade was one issue, and the other was to redeem the prisoners whose deliverance he had prevented some years before. On this occasion, Mr. Washington displayed the same lack of wisdom and economy that marks almost every other part of his administration.Pages 47 and 48: "The first

893 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:James Thompson CallenderIf no doubt remains on this point, the question first in order to be examined is decided. Whether there is room for doubt, a summary review of the testimony will ascertain. Can there be a doubt—when all the witnesses have concurred in establishing this one point—that James Thompson Callender corrected the proof sheets? Can there be a doubt when those who sold the copies of the book have all said that?As president, he has never opened his lips nor lifted his pen without threatening or scolding. The grand object of his administration

894 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:They sold them for his benefit, and he received the money. When it has been proven that he received the money from one purchaser himself and that he paid for printing part of it—that part of the manuscript is in his own handwriting—can there be any doubt? In addition to this, one witness declares that he knew him to be involved with the blood of the poor, friendless Connecticut sailor. I see the tear of indignation starting on your cheeks. You anticipate the name of John Adams.1. Every feature in the conduct of Mr.

895 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERJoint publisher with himself, and another witness declared that he explained the meaning of a certain term, supposed to be ambiguous in its application. Is it possible to entertain any doubt? Thus stands the evidence as to the publication.It will be proper for me, gentlemen of the jury, to state to you what constitutes a publication in point of law, as it pertains to writing or printing. The direct or indirect circulation or emission of a libel is considered a publication thereof, in law and in fact, and this has never been

896 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:856 & AMERICAN STATE TRIALSThe second question will decide whether your hearts are at ease, whether your passions are untouched, and whether your feelings are unaffected now that you have fully heard the charge. You know best. It remains only for me, gentlemen of the jury, to call upon you, in the name of your country, whose interests you are to defend while you protect the rights of the individual. I call upon you in the name of your God, a portion of whose justice you are about to administer, and on your oaths,

897 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDER**Judge Chase:** I desire to know what you intend to prove by the witness.**Mr. Hay:** We intend to examine Colonel Taylor to prove that he had avowed principles in his presence which justified Mr. Callender in saying that the President was an aristocrat. He had voted against the sequestration law and the resolutions concerning the suspension of commercial intercourse with Great Britain, by which he defeated every effort of those who were in favor of those beneficial measures that were well calculated to promote the happiness of their country.**Judge Chase:** You must

898 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:858 &X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALS.The questions intended to be put, and which were propounded by Mr. Nicholas, declared Colonel Taylor’s evidence to be inadmissible. No evidence, he said, is admissible that does not justify the whole charge. The charge you mean to justify by this witness, as I understand you, is that the President is a professed aristocrat and that he has proved serviceable to the British interest. You must prove both these points, or you prove nothing. Now, as you do not attempt to prove the whole of one specific charge, but only

899 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERGranting you a writ of error in the Supreme Court is on these grounds that I reject the evidence of the gentleman. The very argument assigned by the young gentleman who spoke last has convinced my mind that I am right. The offered testimony has no direct and proper application to the issue; it would deceive and mislead the jury. An argumentative justification of a trivial, unimportant part of a libel would be urged before a jury as a substantial vindication of the whole. By misleading the jury under such legal testimony,

900 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:In the opinion given by the court, I understand that evidence cannot be produced by the traverser to prove the truth of only a part of a charge. However, if evidence could be adduced to prove the entire charge, then such evidence would be admissible. One specific charge is twofold: that the President is an aristocrat and that he proved serviceable to British interests.We believe the evidence will support this charge. We wish to prove the truth of the entire charge if we can, though I am not certain it is within our power.

901 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDEROther testimony, however irregular or improper, might also be admitted. Particularly, it would be a departure from the universal principle of law, which requires the production of the best testimony that the nature of every case admits. The journals and records of Congress are the best evidence of what votes have been given on any subject discussed before that body.John Chase, Mr. Nelson: Being very much pressed by the young gentlemen who defend the traverser to admit this testimony, I was going to recommend that you permit those questions to be put

902 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:In the case of American State Trials, the question arises whether juries have the right to determine both the law and the facts. In Virginia, an act of the assembly has adopted the common law of England; therefore, this common law possesses all the authority of a legislative act within the state. According to an act of Congress, the rules of proceedings in the Federal courts in various states are directed to conform to the rules of the states in which such courts may be in session. By that act of Congress, it is

903 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERThe question of whether a petit jury has the right to decide on the constitutionality of a law is one that I have deliberately considered. I am ready to explain my reasons for concluding that the jury does not possess this right and that granting such power would be extremely dangerous. Hear my words: I wish the world to know them—my opinion is the result of mature reflection.Mr. Wirt: I shall state to the court, in a few words, the reasons which have led me to attribute this right to the jury.

904 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:As challenging as the task may be, I shall offer a few observations to show that they have this right. I intend to defend Mr. Callender by establishing two points.First, a law contrary to the Constitution is void. Second, the jury has the right to consider both the law and the facts. It seems to be universally acknowledged that when the legislature exercises a power not granted by the Constitution, the judiciary will disregard their acts. The second point, that the jury has the right to decide the law and the facts, appears equally

905 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERAccording to the dictates of conscience and the laws of the country, controlling them would endanger the right of this most invaluable mode of trial.I have understood that some reliance would be placed on two decisions of the courts of this State, in which they determined two acts of our legislature to be unconstitutional. However, when we analyze these decisions, they do not authorize the belief that the jury lacks the right I contend for. They only prove that the judiciary can declare legislative acts to be unconstitutional; they do not prove

906 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:866 X. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSYour Honor, the arguments I shall present are directed to the court, not intended for the jury or the numerous audience present. This decision holds significant importance; much of the public happiness, peace, and liberty depend on the final verdict pronounced on this matter. Initially, I had doubts, but a calm and dispassionate inquiry, along with the most temperate investigation and reflection, has led me to believe and assert that the jury has the right to determine every question necessary before a sentence can be pronounced upon the defendant.I contend

907 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:JAMES THOMPSON CALLENDERI wish to interrupt them improperly; there was no occasion to be captious, and concluded thus, "Act as you please, sir."Judge Chase, I will assign my reasons why I will not permit the counsel for the traverser to offer arguments to the jury, urging them to do what the Constitution and law of this country will not permit. If I should allow it, I would, in my judgment, violate my duty, disregard the Constitution and law, and surrender the judicial power of the United States—that is, the power entrusted by the Constitution

908 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:In the case of American State Trials, the statute under which the defendant, referred to as the traverser, is indicted provides an excuse if the allegations contained in the publication are proven true. If not all of the twenty sets of words stated in the indictment as charges against the traverser are proven, or if the traverser can prove any of them to be true, the jury will acquit him of those charges not established against him, as well as those he can prove to be true. The jury will then find him guilty

909 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:In the case before them, the jury's role is to determine the facts and not to decide whether a statute of the United States is a law or whether it is void based on the opinion that it is unconstitutional, meaning contrary to the Constitution of the United States. I acknowledge that the jury must compare the statute with the facts presented and then decide whether the actions taken are prohibited by the law and whether they constitute the offense described in the indictment. This power is necessarily possessed by the jury to enable

910 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:If anyone can be so weak in intellect as to entertain this opinion of Congress, they must give up the exercise of the power when informed that Congress had no authority to vest it in any body whatsoever. This is because, as I will hereafter show, the Constitution expressly grants this right to the judicial power of the United States, and it is recognized by Congress through a perpetual statute. If the statute were to be held void by a jury, it would seem that they could not claim a right to such a

911 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:The effects of the exercise of this power by petit jurors may be readily conceived. It appears to me that the right now claimed has a direct tendency to dissolve the Union of the United States, on which, under Divine Providence, our political safety, happiness, and prosperity depend.No citizen of knowledge and information, unless under the influence of passion or prejudice, will believe, without very strong and indubitable proof, that Congress will intentionally make any law in violation of the Federal Constitution and their sacred trust. I admit that the Constitution contemplates that Congress

912 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Among other things, it is declared that the Constitution shall be the supreme law of the land. By the third article, it is established that "the judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as Congress may from time to time ordain and establish; and that the judicial power shall extend to all cases in law and equity, arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States."Among the cases which may arise under the Constitution are all the restrictions on the authority of

913 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:If this exposition of this solemn obligation is substantially correct, I cannot believe that any person with the same understanding of it will maintain that a petit jury can rightfully exercise the power granted by the Constitution to the Federal judiciary.From these considerations, I draw the conclusion that the judicial power of the United States is the only proper and competent authority to decide whether any statute made by Congress (or any of the state legislatures) is contrary to, or in violation of, the Federal Constitution.This was the opinion of the Senate and House

914 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:In the case of the United States, the statute was challenged but ultimately deemed constitutional by the courts, and their decision was accepted.I came across a report of a case, Kamper v. Hawkins, decided in 1793 in the general court of this commonwealth. The case concerned the constitutionality of a law that granted district courts the power to issue injunctions in certain situations. The judges of the general court, by a four-to-one decision, determined that the law was unconstitutional and void.Yesterday, I reviewed the record of another case from the Court of Appeals of

915 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:The courts of the United States will be uniform, or they will become so through the revision and correction of the Supreme Court. This ensures that the same principles will pervade the entire Union. However, the opinions of petit juries will likely differ across various states.The decisions of courts of justice will not be influenced by political and local principles and prejudices. If inferior courts commit errors, these can be rectified. However, if juries make mistakes, there is no revision or control over their verdicts, and therefore, no mode to obtain uniformity in their

916 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:876 XY. AMERICAN STATE TRIALSIf the Constitution of the United States had not given the judiciary the right to decide on the constitutionality of Federal laws—yet if such power could be exercised, it could not be by a juror. This is because it is a maxim of law in all the states that the courts have the exclusive right to decide every question regarding the admissibility of evidence in every case, civil or criminal, whether the evidence is by act of assembly, by deed, or other writing, or by witnesses.Judge Chase concluded by observing

919 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:INDEXAAdams, John- Counsel for the prosecution in the trial of William Weems and other British soldiers for the murder of Crispus Attucks and others, 421.- His closing speech to the jury, 471-490.- Counsel for the prisoner in the trial of Captain Thomas Preston for the same crime, 510.- Libeled while President of the United States by Thomas Cooper, 778.Adams, Joseph- Judge in the trial of Robert McConaghy for the murder of Rosanna Brown and her five children, 602.Arnold, Reuben R.- Counsel for the prisoner in the trial of Leo Frank for the murder of

920 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:### Index#### Court Proceedings- **The Court Sustains the Indictment**: Page 524- **The Jury**: Page 524- **The Prisoner Petitions the Court for a Jury of Englishmen**: Page 525- **Mr. Weaver's Opening Speech**: Page 525- **Witnesses for the Prosecution**: Pages 525-530- **Mr. Nicholl's Speech to the Jury for the Prisoner**: Pages 531-534- **Mr. Emot’s Speech to the Jury for the Prisoner**: Pages 534-537- **The Chief Justice's Charge to the Jury**: Pages 536-537- **The Verdict of Guilty**: Page 537- **The Prisoner’s Petition for Mercy**: Page 538- **The Sentence to Death**: Page 539- **The Prisoner Pardoned and Released**:

921 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:INDEX881Counsel for the State in the trial of Mrs. Herman H. Hirsch for blackmail, 656.His closing speech to the jury for the State, 691-495.Bromish SovereignsSee MANWANINA, KPWAGP, Preston, Carr, THOMAS, Wome, Woan.Brown, ClarkAuthor of the history of Franklin County, Missouri, 162. Reminiscences of the execution of Edward D. Worrell for murder, 162.Brown, RosannaTrial of Robert McConaghy for the murder of Mrs. Brown and her five children, 601-628.Broventon, Sampson J.Attorney-General of New York Province, 521. Refuses to prosecute Colonel Nicholas Bayard for high treason, 621.Brory, William H.Acquitted of the murder of Basil H. Gordon, 182.Bourlock,

922 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:IndexJudge Chase and the Trial Proceedings- Judge Chase admits the book as evidence, pages 847-860.- Libelous extracts from the book relating to Presidents Washington and Adams, pages 860-855.- Mr. Nelson's second speech to the jury, pages 851-856.- Mr. Taylor, a witness for the defense, is rejected by the court because he could not prove the truth of all the alleged libel, pages 857-861.- Mr. Wirt addresses the jury for the prisoner, page 861.- Interruptions by Judge Chase, pages 861-862.- Mr. Nicholas addresses the jury for the prisoner, page 865.- Mr. Hay’s address to the

923 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:INDEXCoacrzs, John D.- Counsel for the State in the trial of Edward D. Worrell for the murder of Basil H. Gordon, 6- His opening speech to the jury, 7-11Confessions- DeWolff, Orrin (murder), 564- McConaghy, Robert (murder), 621Continuance- Refused by the court in the trial of Edward D. Worrell for the murder of Basil H. Gordon, 6Cook, W. J.- Trial for blackmail, 624-654- The Narrative, 624-627- The Judge, 628- The Counsel for the State and Prisoner, 628- The Jury, 629- Mr. Bedgood moves for a change of venue due to community prejudice and newspaper comments,

924 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:INDEX**Cornbury, Edward H.**Governor of New York Province, 518**Costa, Nicola**See Gremut, Pozo**Cushing, John**Judge in the trial of William Weems and other British soldiers for the murder of Crispus Attucks and others, 418D**Davis, John**Judge in the trial of Gilbert Pedro and others for piracy, 700**De Guzman, Domingo**See Graext, Papzo**Dunstan, Abraham**Judge in the trial of Nicholas Bayard for high treason, 521**De Soto, Bernardo**See Graret, Pro**Dewey, Charles A.**Judge in the trial of Orrin De Wolf for the murder of William Stiles, 540**DeWolf, Orrin**Trial for the murder of William Stites, 540-566- The narrative, 540- The Judges, 540- The Counsel

925 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:INDEX 885**His Speech to the Jury for the Prisoner**- Pages 634-537**Executions**- Boyaa, Manuel (piracy), 773- Castillo, Manuel (piracy), 778- Garcia, Angel (piracy), 773- Gibert, Pedro (piracy), 773- Leisler, Jacob (treason), 516- Montenegro, Juan (piracy), 113- McConaghy, Robert (murder), 521- Ruiz, Francisco (piracy), 173- Worrell, Edward D. (murder), 162**Experts**- The testimony regarding the possibility of a white child having a black father, 571-580**F****Ferrara, Antonio**- See Cusack, Pedro**Frank, Leo M.**- Trial for the murder of Mary Phagan, 182-414**The Narrative**- Pages 182-188**The Judge**- Page 138**The Lawyers for the State and Prisoner**- Page 189**The Jurors**- Page 190**The Witnesses

926 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:INDEXGovernor Slaton commutes the sentence to imprisonment for life, 412.Frank is attacked in prison by a fellow convict and severely wounded, 412.Frank is lynched by a mob, 413, 414.Gaz, Dame Q.Counsel for the State in the trial of Edward D. Worrell for the murder of Basil H. Gordon, 5.His closing address to the jury, 12-76.Gazcu, AngelSee Greer, Proao.Greer, ProaoTrial of Pengo Greer, Brasavo DeSoto, Francisco Rom, Nicova Costa, Antonio Ferrer, Maximo Borja, Domingo De Guzman, Juan Antonio Portana, Manuel Castillo, Angel Gazcu, Jose Velazquez, and Juan Montenegro for piracy, 699-773.The narrative, 699, 700.The Judges,

927 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Index**Gwrx, Alexander**- Counsel for the Commonwealth in the trial of Robert McConaghy for the murder of Rosanna Brown and her five children, 803.H**Hass, Hesseet**- Counsel for the prisoner in the trial of Leo Frank for the murder of Mary Phagan, 189.**Haz, John H.**- Counsel for the prisoner in the trial of John Hodges for treason, 164.**Harreaan, James**- See Wrens, William.**Hay, Gronox**- Counsel for the prisoner in the trial of James T. Callender for libel, 821.- Asks for postponement of trial until next term, 826-827.- His address to the jury interrupted by Judge Chase, 866.-

928 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:IndexHovars, John- Trial of, for treason, 163-181- The Narrative, 163- The Judges, 163- The Counsel, 164- Mr. Glenn's opening speech, 164-165- The witnesses for the Prosecution, 166-169- The witnesses for the Prisoner, 169- Mr. Glenn asks for instruction from the Court as to what constitutes treason, 168- Mr. Pinkney objects, 170- Mr. Pinkney’s address to the Jury, 170-176- Chief Justice Duvall rules that delivering up the prisoners to the enemy was treason, 176- Judge Houston dissents, 176- Mr. Pinkney’s closing speech to the Jury, 176-181- The verdict of not guilty, 181Hoores, Frank A.- Counsel

929 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:IndexMistrial Requests:- A mistrial was requested and refused due to cheers from the crowd in the street while the jury was deliberating (pages 298-400).Change of Venue:- A change of venue was refused despite requests due to community prejudice and newspaper criticism (page 629).Juror Objections:- No objection was raised to a juror who, along with the complainant, was a stockholder in the same corporation (page 629).Notable Individuals:- Adams, John (pages 421, 509)- Arnold, Reuben R. (pages 189, 628, 656)- Bay, W. V. N. (page 5)- Bedgood, James H. (pages 628, 656)- Bell, James M. (page

930 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:IndexLynne, Bensautn- Judge in the trial of William Weems and seven other British soldiers for the murder of Crispus Attucks and others, 418.- Judge in the trial of Captain Thomas Preston for the same crime, 610.Manwaring, Edward- Trial for the murder of Crispus Attucks and others, 511.- The Narrative and Trial, 611.Maverick, Samuel- See Weems, William.McCauley, Wor- See Weems, William.McConaghy, Robert- Trial for the murder of Rosanna Brown and her five children, 601-623.- The Narrative, 601-602.- The Judges, 602.- The Counsel for the Commonwealth, 603.- The Counsel for the Prisoner, 604.- The Indictment, 604.-

931 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:INDEX891Nixon, Hoar- Counsel for the United States in the trial of James T. Callender for libel, 821.- His opening speech to the jury, 840-841.- His second speech to the jury, 851-856.New Trials- Refused by the Supreme Court after the conviction of Edward B.D. Worrell for the murder of Basil H. Gordon, 161.- Refused by Judge Roan after the conviction of Leo Frank for the murder of Mary Phagan, 410.- Also refused by the Supreme Court of Georgia, 410.- Also refused by Judge Hill, who succeeded Judge Roan, 410.- Also refused by the Supreme Court

932 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Index**His Opening Address to the Jury**Pages 170-176**His Closing Speech to the Jury**Pages 176-181**Piracy**Trial of Pedro Gibert and eleven othersPages 699-773**Postana, Juan Antonio**See also Grmret, Pogo**Preston, Captain Thomas**See also Weems, WilliamThe trial of Captain Thomas Preston for the murder of Crispus Attucks and othersPages 509-610- **The Narrative**Page 509- **The Jurors**Page 508- **The Evidence**Page 509- **The Verdict of Acquittal**Page 610**Pumstter, Dr. Joseph**Sketch of Dr. Joseph PumstterPage 776Recommends Thomas Cooper to President AdamsPage 781**Quincy, Josiah Jr.**Counsel for prisoners in the trial of William Weems and other British soldiers for the murder of Crispus Attucks and othersPage 421-

933 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:INDEXRossiter, Howard S.- Counsel for the prisoner in the trial of Mrs. Herman H. Hirsch for blackmail, 656.- His speech to the jury for the prisoner, 686-691.Roe, Francisco- See Garrett, Penrose.Sampson, William- Counsel for the prisoner in the trial of Alexander Whistelo for bastardy, 568.- His humorous cross-examination of Dr. Mitchell, the expert, 674-678.- His humorous speech for the prisoner, 583-598.Sempron Act- See Callender.Cooper, Thomas- Judge in the trial of Orrin DeWolf for the murder of William Stiles, 540.- His charge to the jury, 553-564.- Sentences the prisoner to be hanged, 664.Slaton, John M.-

934 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:INDEXTREASON- Bayard, Nicholas, 518-539- Hodges, John, 163-181- Letaler, Jacob, 612-617Trowbridge, JudgeJudge in the trial of William Weems and other British soldiers for the murder of Crispus Attucks and others, 418. His charge to the Jury, 496-508.Van Hoorn, Mr.Counsel for the Prosecution in the trial of Alexander Whistelo for bastardy, 568. His opening speech, 568. His closing speech, 581-583.Van Wren, Pierre C.Judge in the trial of Alexander Whistelo for bastardy, 567.Verarques, JosiahSee Gerrit, Jacob.VenueChange of venue refused when asked on the grounds of prejudice in the community and newspaper comments, 629.Wann, WilliamSee Weems, William.Warrens, RobertJudge

935 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:INDEX---**The Judges**Page 567**The Counsel for the Prosecution and Defense**Page 568**Mr. Vanhook Opens the Case for the Prosecution**Page 568**The Evidence**Pages 569-580**Mr. Morton's Speech for the Defense**Pages 580-581**Mr. Vanhook Follows for the Prosecution**Pages 581-583**Mr. Sampson's Humorous Speech for the Defense**Pages 583-598**The Decision of the Court**Pages 598-600**The Acquittal**Page 600---**Warr, Huot**See Ware, WLM**Wipe, Sauor**Judge in the trial of Orrin DeWolf for the murder of William StilesPage 540**Wilkinson, Ezra**Counsel for the Commonwealth in the trial of Orrin DeWolf for the murder of William StilesPage 541His argument for the ProsecutionPages 551-553**Wusor, Andrew P.**Counsel for the Prisoner in the trial of

936 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Index of Witnesses—Continued- Bernard, S., 238- Bethune, Captain, 733- Bird, J. P., 218- Black, John R., 194- Blair, Mollie, 237- Bliss, Theodore, 458- Blocher, Daniel, 67- Boehm, Julian V., 238- Born, J. T., 238- Botson, William, 447- Bourgat, Charles, 611- Bovell (a soldier), 630- Bowe, General, 166- Bowe, Robert, 168- Bowman, Archibald, 446- Boyce, Leon, 288- Branch, Harlee, 719- Brent, T. Y., 242- Brewer, James, 425- Bridgham, Ebenezer, 424- Briggs, Capt. Jeremiah, 730- Brown, Joseph, 288- Brown, William, 605- Bruce, W. S., 734- Buckly, John, 529- Buckley, John, 447- Budd, Capt. George, 731- Burdick,

937 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:IndexWitnesses—Continued- Daniels, Benjamin, 711- Darley, N. F., 198, 206, 288- Davers, R. V., 399- Davis, Benjamin, 445, 450- Davis, Isaac, 549- Davis, Mary, 238- Davis, William, 451- Denham, Mrs. Georgia, 287- Denham, Harry, 210- Devens, Captain, 781- Dickerson, Opte, 223- Dittler, Alex, 388- Dittler, Emil, 238- Dixon, John, 843- Dixon, William, 446- Dobbs, L. S., 191- Dodge, James, 424- Domingo, Simon, 726- Donaldson, J., 169- Donegan, Mrs. C. D., 238- Duffy, J. H., 287- Dunn, James, 67- Duval, William, 842- Eaton, Thomas B., 560- Edwards, Rodolphus C., 543, 550- Einstein, L., 288- Elder, W.

938 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:IndexWritings—Continued- Haas, Isaac, 224- Hale, Daniel F., 787- Hall, Coruther, 208, 337- Hall, Hattie, 208- Hamilton, I. M., 218- Hancock, Dr. Thomas, 220- Hare, Peter, 612- Harlow, Gideon, 550- Harris, A. I., 238- Harris, Dr. H. F., 200- Harvey, Ford, 19- Haslett, B. B., 198- Hatchett, Mary, 237- Hatchett, Willie, 237- Hay, Gustavus, 167- Hayes, Velma, 237- Hays, Ida, 228- Hearn, J. T., 238- Hefner, F. P., 288- Heilbron, Fred, 238- Hemingway, Samuel, 426- Hewes, Sheubel, 445- Heyman, Arthur, 223- Heywood, Dr. B. F., 643, 551- Hewell, Dewey, 239- Hicks, C. H., 644, 659-

939 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Index B99Witnesses—Continued- Larcom, Benjamin, 709- Lasher, Herbert, 223- Lasaiter, R. M., 199- Lee, Benjamin, 452- Lee, Charlie, 217, 288- Lee, Newt, 190- Levy, Mrs. A. P., 212- Lewis, Harry, 223- Lewis, John, 711- Lightner, Dr. J. G., 608- Lincoln, John W., 548- Loeb, Cohen, 212- Loeb, Helen, 238- Loeb, Julian, 212- Loeb, Marcus, 238- Lyon, James, 843- Mangum, C. W., 208- Mann, Alonzo, 214- Mansfield, John, 458- Marcus, Mrs. A. E., 216- Marcus, Mrs. M., 216- Marshall, Edward, 528- Marshall, Thomas, 429- Martin, Al H., 644, 659- Marz, Dr. David, 223- Marx, Mrs. David,

940 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Index of Witnesses**Patterson, B. L.** - 218**Payne, Edward** - 458**Payne, Frank** - 217**Peabody, Joseph** - 708**Peres, Joseph** - 711**Pettis, Nellie** - 238**Peyton, W. H.** - 731**Pickett, B. H.** - 240**Pierce, James** - 645**Pirk, Mary** - 213, 238**Pleasants, Samuel** - 843**Pollard, C. E.** - 208**Post, Dr.** - 570**Prentiss, James** - 649**Prescott, E. G.** - 736**Prescott, Ebenezer** - 737**Pride, Arthur** - 218**Prince, Newton** - 448**Quary, George** - 610**Quentin, George H.** - 721**Quinn, Lemmie** - 209**Ralain, Robert W.** - 66**Randall, Jno. Jr.** - 166**Ray, Adam** - 571**Read, Benjamin B.** - 709**Read, John** - 528**Reed, J. D.** -

941 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:INDEX901Witnesses—Continued:- Strong, William, 446- Stuart, Warren V., 13- Sturgeon, Isaac H., 32- Sumner, Charles, 736- Symmonds, Thomas, 457- Taylor, Clay, 17- Taylor, Colonel John, 856- Taylor, John, 607- Taylor, Kate, 643, 658- Thayer, Nathaniel, 428- Thomas, Mrs. Ella, 237- Thompson, James, 447- Thompson, Mrs. Mattie, 228- Tillander, O., 241- Tilary, Dr., 570- Todd, John W., 223- Townsend, Gregory, 448- Tudor, Captain, 535- Turner, W. E., 239- Turner, Samuel A., 734- Urquhart, George, 58- Ursenbach, C. F., 315- Ursenbach, Mrs. C. F., 215- Vanderhoff, Prof. J. B., 223- Vesey, Rev. Mr., 535- Waddel, John, 447-

942 Page – American State Trials 1918 Volume X Leo Frank Document

Here is the translated text as follows:Index- Mr. Gale's closing address to the jury for the State: 72-76- Mr. Wright's closing address to the jury for the prisoner: 76-108- Mr. Bay's closing address to the jury for the State: 106-153- Judge Stone's charge to the jury: 153-160- The verdict of guilty: 161- The sentence to death: 161- The Supreme Court refuses a new trial: 161- Braff, the accomplice, afterwards tried and acquitted: 163- The execution: 162Worrell, Edward D.- Counsel for the prisoner in the trial of Edward D. Worrell for the murder of Basil H. Gordon: 5- His opening speech

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 3

Has Audio

SUPPLEMENTARY MESSAGE OF THE GOVERNOR EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT. STATE OF GEORGIA. June 21, 1915: In Re Leo M. Frank, Fulton Superior Court, sentenced to be executed June 22, 1915. Saturday, April 26, 1913, was Memorial Day in Georgia and a general holiday. At that time, Mary Phagan, a white girl of about 14 years of age, was in the employ of the National Pencil Company, located near the corner of Forsyth and Hunter Streets, in the City of Atlanta. She came to the pencil factory a little after noon to obtain the money due her for her work on the preceding

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 4

Has Audio

I desire to say in this connection that the people of the State of Georgia desire the esteem and good will of the people of every State in the Union. Every citizen wishes the approbation of his fellows, and a State or Nation is not excepted. In the preamble to the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote that 'When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the Laws

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 5

Has Audio

the dignity of her laws, and if the choice must be made between the approbation of citizens of other States and the enforcement of our laws against offenders, whether powerful or weak, we must choose the latter alternative. Mobs. It is charged that the court and jury were terrorized by a mob and the jury was coerced into their verdict. I expect to present the facts in this case with absolute fairness and to state conditions with regard only to the truth. When Frank was indicted and the air was filled with rumors as to the murder and mutilation of

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 6

Has Audio

During the progress of the case, after evidence had been introduced laying the crime, with many offensive details, upon Frank, the feeling against him became intense. He was the general superintendent of the factory, and Mary Phagan was a poor working girl. He was a Cornell graduate, and she was dependent for her livelihood upon her labor. According to a witness, whose testimony will subsequently be related more completely, when this girl came to get her small pay, since she only worked one day in the week because of a lack of material, this general superintendent solicited her to yield

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 7

Has Audio

I had the sheriff call at the Mansion and inquired whether he anticipated trouble. This was after many people had told me of possible danger and an editor of a leading newspaper indicated his anticipation of trouble. The sheriff stated he thought his deputies could avert any difficulty. Judge Roan telephoned me that he had arranged for the defendant to be absent when the verdict was rendered. Like Governor Brown, I entered into communication with the colonel of the Fifth Regiment, who stated he would be ready if there were necessity.I was leaving on Saturday, the day the verdict was

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 8

Has Audio

Our Supreme Court, after carefully considering the evidence as to demonstrations made by spectators, declared them without merit, and in this regard, the orderly processes of our tribunals are not subject to criticism.Racial Prejudice.The charge against the State of Georgia of racial prejudice is unfair. A conspicuous Jewish family in Georgia is descended from one of the original colonial families of the State. Jews have been presidents of our Boards of Education, principals of our schools, mayors of our cities, and conspicuous in all our commercial enterprises.The Facts in the Case.Many newspapers and non-residents have declared that Frank was convicted

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 9

Has Audio

The State's Case.The State proved that Leo M. Frank, the general superintendent of the factory, was in his office a little after 12 o'clock on the 26th day of April, 1913, and he admitted having paid Mary Phagan $1.20, being the wages due her for one day's work. She asked Frank whether the metal had come, in order to know when she could return for work. Frank admits this, and so far as is known, he was the last one who saw her alive. At three o'clock the next morning (Sunday), Newt Lee, the night watchman, found in the basement

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 10

Has Audio

which would enable her to arrive at the factory within the neighborhood of about thirty minutes. The element of exact time will be discussed later.Dr. Harris, the Secretary of the State Board of Health, and an expert in this line, examined the contents of Mary Phagan's stomach ten days after her burial and found from the state of the digestion of the cabbage and bread that she must have been killed within about thirty minutes after she had eaten the meal.Newt Lee, the Negro night watchman, testified that Frank 'had told me to be back at the factory at 4

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 11

Has Audio

dropped his head and stated, "If you keep that up, we will both go to hell."On Sunday morning at about 3 o'clock, after Newt Lee, the night watchman, had telephoned the police station about the discovery of the dead body, and the officers had come to the factory, they endeavored to reach Frank by telephone but could not get a response. They telephoned at 7:30 Sunday morning and told Frank that they wanted him to come down to the factory. When they came for him, he was very nervous and trembled. The body at that time had been taken to

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 12

Has Audio

The cook's husband testified that on Saturday, the day of the murder, he visited his wife at the home of Mr. Selig, defendant's father-in-law, where Frank and his wife were living, and that Frank came in to dinner and ate nothing. The Negro cook of the Seligs was placed upon the stand and denied that her husband was in the kitchen at all on that day. For purposes of impeachment, therefore, the State introduced an affidavit from this cook taken by the detectives, and as she claimed under duress, which tended to substantiate the story of her husband and which

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 13

Has Audio

that some punches had been missed. The suggestion was that he had either manipulated the slip to place the burden on Lee or was so excited as to be unable to read the slip correctly.The State introduced a witness, Monteen Stover, to prove that at the time when Mary Phagan and Frank were in the metal room, she was in Frank's office, and he was absent, although he had declared he had not left his office. The State showed that the hair of Mary Phagan had been washed by the undertaker with pine tar soap, which would change its color

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 14

Has Audio

Where I have not mentioned the more prominent ones, an inspection of the record fails to maintain the contention.It is contended that a lawyer was engaged for Frank at the station house before he was arrested. This is replied to by the defense that a friend had engaged counsel without Frank's knowledge, and the lawyer advised Frank to make a full statement to the detectives.Jim Conley.The most startling and spectacular evidence in the case was that given by a Negro, Jim Conley, a man 27 years of age, and one who frequently had been in the chain gang. Conley had

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 16

Has Audio

Conley described Frank as having been in a position which Conley thought indicated perversion, but the facts set out by Conley do not demand such a conclusion. Conley says that he found Mary Phagan lying in the metal room some 200 feet from the office, with a cloth tied about her neck and under her head as though to catch blood, although there was no blood at the place. Frank told Conley to get a piece of cloth and put the body in it, and Conley got a piece of striped bed ticking and tied up the body in it

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 17

Has Audio

and told him, 'Here is $200,' but after a while requested the money back, and got it.One witness testified she saw some Negro, whom she did not recognize, sitting at the side of the elevator in the gloom. On the extraordinary motion for a new trial, a woman, who was unimpeached, made an affidavit that on the 31st of May, through a newspaper report, she saw that Conley claimed he met Frank by agreement at the corner of Forsyth & Nelson Sts., on the 26th of April, 1913, and she became satisfied that she saw the two in close conversation

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 18

Has Audio

citizens of Atlanta, college mates at Cornell, and professors of that college.The defendant was born in Texas, and his education was completed at the institution named.The admission of Conley that he wrote the notes found at the body of the dead girl, together with the part he admitted he played in the transaction, combined with his history and his explanation as to both the writing of the notes and the removal of the body to the basement, makes the entire case revolve around him. Did Conley speak the truth?Before going into the varying and conflicting affidavits made by Conley, it

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 19

Has Audio

Conley testified that on the morning of April 26th, he went down into the basement to relieve his bowels and utilized the elevator shaft for the purpose.On the morning of April 27th at 3 o'clock, when the detectives came down into the basement by way of the ladder, they inspected the premises, including the shaft, and they found there human excrement in natural condition.Subsequently, when they used the elevator, which everybody, including Conley, who had run the elevator for one and one-half years, admits only stops by hitting the ground in the basement, the elevator struck the excrement and mashed

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 20

Has Audio

elevator shaft was in accordance with his testimony that he made water twice against the door of the elevator shaft on the morning of the 26th, instead of doing so in the gloom of his corner behind the boxes where he kept watch.Mary Phagan, in coming downstairs, was compelled to pass within a few feet of Conley, who was invisible to her and in a few feet of the hatchway. Frank could not have carried her down the hatchway. Conley might have done so with difficulty. If the elevator shaft was not used by Conley and Frank in taking the

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 21

Has Audio

which everybody admits could not have been before 12:05, Frank suddenly said, "Here comes Emma Clark and Corinthia Hall," and he put Conley in a wardrobe.The uncontradicted evidence of these two witnesses, and they are unimpeached, was they reached the factory at 11:35 A.M. and left it at 11:45 A.M., and therefore this statement of Conley can hardly be accepted.Conley says that when they got the body to the bottom of the elevator in the basement, Frank told him to leave the hat, slipper, and piece of ribbon right there, but he "took the things and pitched them over in

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 22

Has Audio

the head and reached the skull. Wounds of that character bleed freely. At the place Conley says he found blood, there was no blood. Conley says there was a cloth tied around the head as though to catch the blood, but none was found there.One Barrett says that on Monday morning he found six or seven strands of hair on the lathe with which he worked and which were not there on Friday. The implication is that it was Mary Phagan's hair and that she received a cut by having her head struck at this place. It is admitted that

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 23

Has Audio

Detective Black says, "Mr. Starnes, who was there with me, did not call my attention to any blood splotches."Detective Scott says, "We went to the metal room where I was shown some spots supposed to be blood spots."A part of what they thought to be blood was chipped up in four or five chips, and Dr. Claude Smith testified that on one of the chips he found, under a microscope, from three to five blood corpuscles; a half drop would have caused it.Frank says that the part of the splotch that was left after the chips were taken up was

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 24

Has Audio

Conley's Affidavits.The defense procured under notice one statement and three affidavits taken by the detectives from Conley and introduced them in evidence.The first statement, dated May 18, 1913, gives a minute detail of his actions on the 26th day of April and specifies the saloons he visited and the whiskey and beer he bought, and minutely itemized the denomination of the money he had and what he spent for beer, whiskey, and pan sausage. This comprehends the whole of affidavit No. 1.On May 24, 1913, he made for the detectives an affidavit in which he says that on Friday before

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 25

Has Audio

"second and last statement." In that, he states that on Saturday morning after leaving home, he bought two beers for himself and then went to a saloon and won 90 cents with dice, where he bought two more beers and a half pint of whiskey, some of which he drank, and he met Frank at the corner of Forsyth and Nelson Streets, and Frank asked him to wait until he returned.Conley went over to the factory and mentioned various people whom he saw from his place of espionage going up the stairs to Mr. Frank's office. Then Frank whistled to

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 26

Has Audio

On the 29th of May, 1913, Conley made another affidavit, in which he said that Frank had told him that he had picked up a girl and let her fall, and Conley hollered to him that the girl was dead, and told him to go to the cotton bag and get a piece of cloth, and he got a big, wide piece of cloth and took her on his right shoulder, when she got too heavy for him, and she slipped off when he got to the dressing room. He called Frank to help, and Frank got a key to

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 27

Has Audio

All of the affidavit down to this point is in typewriting, the original was exhibited to me. At the end of the affidavit in handwriting is written the following: "While I was looking at the money in my hands, Mr. Frank said, 'Let me have that, and I will make it alright with you Monday, if I live and nothing happens,' and he took the money back, and I asked him if that was the way he did, and he said he would give it back Monday."It will be noticed that the first question which would arise would be, what

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 28

Has Audio

for five or six hours again, endeavoring to make clear several points which were far-fetched in his statement. We pointed out to him that this statement would not do and would not fit, and he then made the statement of May 28th, after he had been told that his previous statement showed deliberation and could not be accepted. He told us nothing about Frank making an engagement to stamp and for him to lock the door, and told nothing about Monteen Stover. He did not tell us about seeing Mary Phagan. He said he did not see her. He did

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 29

Has Audio

In his evidence before the jury in the redirect examination, Conley thought it necessary to account for the mesh bag, and for the first time, said that "Mary Phagan's mesh bag was lying on Mr. Frank's desk, and Mr. Frank put it in the safe." This is the first mention of the mesh bag.The first suggestion that was made of Frank being a pervert was in Conley's testimony. On the stand, he declared Frank said "he was not built like other men."There is no proof in the record of Frank being a pervert. The situation in which Conley places him

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 30

Has Audio

Conley swears he did. The State says that the use of the word 'did' instead of 'done' indicates a white man's dictation. Conley admits the spelling was his. The words are repeated and are simple, which characterizes Conley's letters. In Conley's testimony, you will find frequently that he uses the word 'did,' and according to calculations submitted to me, he used the word 'did' over fifty times during the trial.While Conley was in jail charged with being an accessory, there was also incarcerated in the jail a woman named Annie Maude Carter, whom Conley had met at the court house.

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 31

Has Audio

water' just as they are used in the Mary Phagan notes.In Conley's testimony, he says the word 'hisself' constantly.It is urged by the lawyers for the defense that Conley's characteristic was to use double adjectives.In the Mary Phagan notes, he said 'long tall Negro, black,' 'long, slim, tall Negro.'In his testimony, Conley used expressions of this sort: 'He was a tall, slim build, heavy man.' 'A good long wide piece of cord in his hands.'Conley says that he wrote four notes, although only two were found. These notes have in them 129 words, and Conley swears he wrote them in

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 32

Has Audio

In reply to this, the State introduced on the extraordinary motion the testimony of Philip Chambers, who swears that unused order blanks entitled 'Atlanta, Ga.' were in the office next to Frank's office and that he had been in the basement of the factory and found no books or papers left down there for any length of time, but they were always burned up.This evidence was never passed upon by the jury and developed since the trial. It was strongly corroborative of the theory of the defense that the death notes were written, not in Frank's office, but in the

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 33

Has Audio

evidence of Police Sergeant Dobbs, who visited the scene of the crime on Sunday morning, as follows:"This scratch pad was also lying on the ground close to the body. The scratch pad was lying near the notes. They were all right close together. There was a pile of trash near the boiler where this hat was found, and paper and pencils were down there too."Police Officer Anderson testified:"There are plenty of pencils and trash in the basement."Darley testified: "I have seen all kinds of paper down in the basement. The paper that note is written on is a blank order

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 34

Has Audio

The evidence as to the probability of the blank on which the death note was written being in the basement, and the evidence as to the hair, would have tended to show that the murder was not committed on the floor on which Frank's office was located.The Time Question.The State contended that Mary Phagan came to the office of Leo M. Frank to get her pay at some time between 12:05 and 12:10, and that Frank had declared that he was in his office the whole time.It is true that at the coroner's inquest held on Thursday after the murder,

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 35

Has Audio

The evidence loses its pertinency if Mary Phagan had not arrived at the time Monteen Stover came. What is the evidence?The evidence uncontradicted discloses that Mary Phagan ate her dinner at 11:30 o'clock, and the evidence of the streetcar men was that she caught the 11:50 car, which was due at the corner of Forsyth and Marietta Streets at 12:07 1/2. The distance from this place to the pencil factory is about one-fifth of a mile. It required from 4 to 6 minutes to walk to the factory, and especially would the time be enlarged because of the crowds on

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 36

Has Audio

hardly seems possible under the evidence that Mary Phagan was at that time being murdered.Lemmie Quinn testifies that he reached Frank's office about 12:20 and saw Mr. Frank. At 12:30, Mrs. J. A. White called to see her husband at the factory where he was working on the fourth floor, and left again before one o'clock.At 12:50, according to Denham, Frank came up to the fourth floor and said that he wanted to get out. The evidence for the defense tends to show that the time taken for moving the body, according to Conley's description, was so long that it

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 37

Has Audio

found by her side, it was urged before me by counsel for the defense that ladies usually carried their handkerchiefs in their mesh bags.If the motive was assault, either by natural or perverted means, the physicians' evidence, who made the examination, does not disclose its accomplishment. Perversion by none of the suggested means could have occasioned the flood of blood. The doctors testified that excitement might have occasioned it under certain conditions. Under the evidence, which is not set forth in detail, there is every probability that the virtue of Mary Phagan was not lost on the 26th day of

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 38

Has Audio

It may be possible that his version is correct. The testimony discloses that he was in the habit of allowing men to go into the basement for immoral purposes for a consideration, and when Mary Phagan passed by him close to the hatchway leading into the basement and in the gloom and darkness of the entrance, he may have attacked her. What is the truth we may never know.Jury's Verdict.The jury which heard the evidence and saw the witnesses found the defendant, Leo M. Frank, guilty of murder. They are the ones, under our laws, who are chosen to weigh

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 39

Has Audio

In this connection, Judge Roan declared orally from the bench that he was not certain of the defendant's guilt that with all the thought he had put on this case, he was not thoroughly convinced whether Frank was guilty or innocent but that he did not have to be convinced that the jury was convinced and that there was no room to doubt that that he felt it his duty to order that the motion for a new trial be overruled.This statement was not embodied in the motion overruling the new trial.Under our statute, in cases of conviction of murder

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 40

Has Audio

Surely, if Judge Roan entertained the extreme doubt indicated by his statement and had remembered the power granted him by the Code, he would have sentenced the defendant to life imprisonment.In a letter written to counsel, he says, "I shall ask the prison commission to recommend to the governor to commute Frank's sentence to life imprisonment *. It is possible that I showed undue deference to the jury in this case when I allowed the verdict to stand. They said by their verdict that they had found the truth. I was in a state of uncertainty, and so expressed myself

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 41

Has Audio

In the case of Hunter, a white man charged with assassinating two white women in the City of Savannah, who was found guilty and sentenced to be hung, application was made to me for clemency. Hunter was charged together with a Negro with having committed the offense, and after he was convicted, the Negro was acquitted. It was brought out by the statement of the Negro that another Negro, who was half-witted, committed the crime, but no credence was given to the story, and he was not indicted.The judge and solicitor-general refused to recommend clemency, but upon a review of

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 42

Has Audio

at the time he was an escapee from the Fannin County jail under indictment for felony."I refused to interfere unless the judge or solicitor would recommend interference, which they declined to do. Finally, when on the gallows, the solicitor-general recommended a reprieve, which I granted, and finally, on the recommendation of the judge and solicitor-general, as expressed in my order, I reluctantly commuted the sentence to life imprisonment. The doubt was suggested as to the identity of the criminal and as to the credibility of the testimony of prejudiced witnesses. The crime was as heinous as this one and more

Governor To The General Assembly Of Georgia June 23 1915 State Vs Leo Frank Page 43

Has Audio

Judge Roan, with that awful sense of responsibility, which probably came over him as he thought of that Judge before whom he would shortly appear, calls to me from another world to request that I do that which he should have done. I can endure misconstruction, abuse, and condemnation, but I cannot stand the constant companionship of an accusing conscience, which would remind me in every thought that I, as Governor of Georgia, failed to do what I thought to be right. There is a territory 'beyond A REASONABLE DOUBT and absolute certainty,' for which the law provides in allowing

Top