Sunday, 28th September 1913: Roan Not Likely To Hear Plea For New Frank Trial, The Atlanta Journal
The Atlanta Journal,
Sunday, 28th September 1913,
PAGE 1, COLUMN 2.
Although He Would Like
to Do
So, There Is, Little
Probabil-
ity That Case Will
Reach
Him in Time
While Judge L. S. Roan, who presided at the trial of Leo M.
Frank, is ready and willing to hear the motion for a new trial in the
case, it still appears unlikely that the motion will be argued for
several weeks, or before he becomes a judge of the court of
appeals.
Saturday the amended motion for a new trial had not been
served upon the solicitor by Frank's attorneys, and naturally he
cannot commence the preparation of his answer and his brief
until after he has been served, and knows the exact grounds upon
which the motion is based.
Judge Roan, is anxious to dispose of all business pending
before him before he takes his seat on the appellate court bench.
Saturday morning he instructed the solicitor general to have all
pending motions set for October 4 and October 11 in order that
he might dispose of all cases by the last named date, and the
solicitor stated that this would be done as far as possible.
At the same time Judge Roan asked if the prosecuting officer
had yet been served with the amended motion in the Frank case
and the latter replied that he had not.
I had hoped that the matter might be disposed of in the
next two weeks, the court remarked, and the solicitor replied
that when he was served that he would make every effort to get
ready as quickly as possible to argue the motion.
That the solicitor will be able to get ready with his side of the
case within two weeks from the time he is served with the
amended motion is not considered probable.
Should the defense of Frank charge that jurors were
prejudiced before they were chosen, it might take the solicitor
several weeks to get evidence in rebuttal of that introduced by
the defense.
The record of the evidence in the case is so long that it will
take the solicitor probably a week just to read it, and the
preparation of his brief will take probably another week.
The case is an important one, not be slurred over, and as a
result there is little probability of it being argued before the 13th of
next month, when according to present arrangements Judge Ben
H. Hill is expected to exchange pieces with Judge Roan.
As a result of the question of which of the superior court
judges will the Frank motion is still an open one.
The position of Judge Roan in the mater is that the case was
tried before him, and that naturally he should pass upon the
motion if possible. In addition, he is desirous of leaving just as
little unfinished business as possible to his successor.
But if the motion can't be heard before the 13th of October it
is not considered probable that he will postpone the taking of his
seat on the appellate bench simply in order to hear the Frank
motion.
Such action is possible, btu in view of the congested
condition of the courts it is not probable.
When on the appellate bench Judge Roan will be disqualified
to pass upon any case tried by him in the superior court, and for
that reason, he does not wish to hear any more cases in the
superior court.
(Continued on Page 2, Col. 2.)
PAGE 2, COLUMN 2
ROAN NOT LIKELY
TO HEAR PLEA
FOR
NEW FRANK
TRIAL
(Continued From Page 1.)
Therefore, if Judge Hill does not take up the work in the
superior court by October 13, it will mean that the court calendar
will become still more congested and all officials are trying to
guard against this contingency.
There are now in jail 125 felony prisoners, some of whom
have been awaiting trial for several months. There are eight or
ten murder cases in the lot, and other serious felonies which it will
take the court some time to try. As a result, the superior court
must grind regularly for several months before the jail is cleared.
There are many hundreds of bond cases, several of them years
old, which the court should dispose of.
It has been more than two months since the criminal division
of the superior court was in session, and new arrests have been
made daily.
The number of pending cases is constantly increasing, and
for that reason it is regarded as likely that despite the Frank case,
Judge Roan and Judge Hill will exchange places on October 13 and
the latter will immediately commence disposing of the pressing
business.
J. W. Coleman, step-father of Mary Phagan, conferred with
Chief Lanford, of the detectives over an hour last night,
presumably in connection with the Frank case.
At the conclusion of the conference, however, neither Mr.
Coleman nor the chief would say what it was about.
PAGE 3, COLUMN 1
INDICTMENTS
AGAINST
L. C. THURMAN
DROPPED
Four indictments, charging atrocious offenses to L. C.
Thurman, for many years well known in Atlanta, were nolle
pressed by Judge L. S. Roan Saturday morning on the
recommendation of the solicitor general.
Rosamund Thurman, aged seven, and her five-year-old
sister, were the principal witnesses on whose testimony the
indictments against their father were returned more than a year
ago.
In recommending that the cases be dropped without cost tot
eh defendant, Solicitor Dorsey told the court that he had been
informed that the little girls now say that they were told to make
the startling charges against their father by their mother and
grandmother.
The mother, the solicitor said, bears a bad reputation, while
the father's general character is excellent.
Judge Roan followed the solicitor's recommendation.